on these sources
source 1: is clearly biased against trans and gay rights
and the paper they sources cites no actual evidence of danger, but instead can be summarised to 'we dont have enough data yet to be sure of the effects of this'
yknow what else we dont have enough data on to be sure of the effects? vaping
source 2: also anti-trans and openly conservative in its biases
they cite the heritage foundation, another overtly right wing outlet. the article they cite there doesnt exist, and their quote from it doesnt tackle the actual medical impact of hormone blockers at all
they also cite 'the christian post' - that is very. obviously. biased.
and theyre all citing the same article as the first, which weve already agreed has no concrete evidence of medical danger
NOW! SOURCE 3! PBS! YOU ACTUALLY GOT A RELIABLE SITE FOR ONCE!
“We have a lot of experience in pediatric endocrinology using pubertal blockers. And from all the evidence we have they are generally a very safe medication.”
"However, the use of puberty blockers to treat transgender children is what’s considered an “off label” use of the medication — something that hasn’t been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. And doctors say their biggest concern is about how long children stay on the medication, because there isn’t enough research into the effects of stalling puberty at the age when children normally go through it."
- again, this is 'no reliable data' not 'data shows this is dangerous'
"“We do know that there is some decrease in bone density during treatment with pubertal suppression,” Finlayson said, adding that initial studies have shown that starting estrogen and testosterone can help regain the bone density. What Finlayson said there isn’t enough research on is whether someone who was on puberty blockers will regain all their bone strength, or if they might be at risk for osteoporosis in the future."
"Another area where doctors say there isn’t enough research is the impact that suppressing puberty has on brain development."
“I wouldn’t use [puberty blockers] if I didn’t think that they were safe, or that the benefits didn’t outweigh the potential risks,” Finlayson said. “But we always have this conversation with families before we start.”
and this is the last quote, bc they move on from talking abt blockers to talking abt transitioning
"“There are so many unanswered questions around the long-term consequences, and whether your health risk profile really becomes that of a male or female,” Garofalo says. “If we start testosterone today, will you have the cardiac risk profile of a male or female as you grow older? Will you develop breast cancer because we’re administering estrogen?"
but overall, this article says
1: doctors are being careful with hormone blockers and are sure they are safe after extensive experience
2: there is not enough data on the effects of long-term taking of hormone blockers
so... no, hormone blockers are not 'really, really dangerous.' two out of three of your sources were incredibly biased and unreliable, from openly transphobic publications. you really need to work on your research skills @A-weird-girler