Nice work. Very relaxing on the eyes and the visual style stands out from the rest of the crowd which is a big win. My critique for you would be to try and approach the writing the same way you have approached the visuals. What do I mean by that?
Well, you've thought a lot about how to be aesthetically unique, but when it comes to dialogue and the "punch line" of the short strips, the writing so far seems reminiscent of a lot of other comics so it's not standing out in that area. A good example of this is bliss. I found that the "pop" and the lead up to the pop was predictable and a little bland, which in a weird way, stood out even more to me because the art is so good to look at. It's like the art is telling me that this comic is going to be different and very worth reading but then the execution isn't very different, which could lead to a lack of high interest.
In regards to bliss, what might have made it stronger (in my opinion) would be to characterize the abstract characters you have a little further by involving their abstractness into the humor. For example, what if the image of perfect bliss wasn't a bubble, but instead a tree or a cloud on a white canvas, that's just been painted by a floating paintbrush above it. So when the offscreen voice reminds the character about the bills, the final panel could instead be the paintbrush suddenly applying too much pressure on the canvas, resulting in a huge splash of paint ruining the character, thus the painting, thus the bliss.
To me, that would be an example of utilizing your abstract characters in a way that's more exclusive to the art style. The destruction of the painting via too much paint is more fitting to the character than the simple popping of a bubble. Does that make sense? Sorry for my lengthy feedback. Just trying to give you a different take since all the other feedbacks were mostly positive only, even though I agree with most of them.