Hmm, I don't think magical realism is when magic is treated as normal. I think it's when fantasy elements and mundane elements are simultaneously heightened.
For example, Harry Potter and Twilight both treat magic as normal but they're fantasy novels. JK Rowling doesn't spend a long time talking about puberty, Dean's football obsession or banks. They're all mentioned briefly but not really touched upon.
Magic realism often has a fixation on the body and bodily functions, taboos and upending the status quo. Basically, if you're reading a book and somebody hasn't described a bodily function in graphic detail, it's probably not magical realism. I'm being overly simplistic but if you read Carter, Marquez or Rushdie, there's a lot of poo, pee, blood and snot. And incest.
I checked the wiki page and I wouldn't trust it. It lists Murakami and Bulgakov as magical realists and they're not. Neither of them play up the mundane enough. I'd say Murakami is a surrealist and Bulgakov is straight out satire.
If you want to do some extra reading, jstor has a lot of stuff.
http://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=magical+realism&filter=
And if you want to go super hardcore, Rabelais and his World by Mikhail Bakhtin which describes some of the main tenets of magical realism such as grotesque realism and the carnivalesque.
@sarahrebecca58 It's a shame your story got rejected. I think a lot of people get put off the idea of magical realism because it's supposed to be super high brow but I think some of the best stuff that's ever been written is magical realism.
Edit: I just read my post back and it's possible I went too far down the rabbit hole. It was a bit like I was a sleeper agent and somebody said the code word and I just woke up but instead of killing people, I just started reciting four years of academia... I'll leave the research up but I'm totally not offended if nobody's actually interested in reading this stuff.