Quarantine lead me down a dark path of doomscrolling through fandom Twitter. I never interact, but I do lurk for hours trying to find sense in the madness. When a fandom thing is criticized one argument I see is this: “Oh, are you saying I’m a bad person because I like X?” At first I thought this was silly. Why should you let the idea of being a bad person stop you from engaging in the conversation? But then I thought...
Isn’t the topic of “bad person” what starts a lot of internet mobs?
Think about it. When a picture/movie/comic etc. has something “problematic” in it the conversation can quickly turn from “This work has troubling portrayals of things and we should criticize it” into “The person who made this is a sick freak and we need to find their address and make sure they never sleep in peace again.” And it usually happens on smaller scales, too. You can’t harass the director of your favorite blockbuster movie the same way you can harass a small time fan artist.
Vigilante justice seems cool on the surface. You’re taking the law into your own hands when the powers that be (in this case probably social media sites) won’t do anything, but I think the problem with it is that it can be directed in the wrong places. Sometimes actual predators are outed and that’s one less person around who can hurt people. But other times mistakes are made and you have mobs taking out the wrong person.
It’s times like these that I really have to wonder if the people who do this really care about the issue of being critical of the work we make and consume or if this a “power” thing. There’s science that says that the same parts of your brain that regulate anger are the same parts that regulate excitement and arousal, so in the same way that someone can get “addicted” to pr0n you could hypothetically get addicted to Twitter drama. So are the people who start some of these dramas actually calling for change or are they riding an adrenaline high fueled by self-righteousness that makes them feel vindicated in stomping on people who they think have done wrong?
Probably the worst thing about all this is that it might not really keep anyone “safe.” There are cases in the real world where vigilante mobs get the wrong person where the actual perpetrator stays out there. So you have groups of people patting themselves on the back thinking they did a good thing while the victims of the predators could still be suffering. And considering how easy it is to pretend to be a good person on the internet, more and more awful people fly under the radar when they learn the “rules.”
Fandom has changed so much over the years. I won’t say things were “better” back in the early 2000s (they probably weren’t), but I will say that things were smaller. The giant scale that fandom operates on nowadays makes it hard to tell how many of these issues are “real issues” and how many are just overblown cases that look big out of context. It makes you wonder if fandom was always THIS crazy but some of us just never noticed because it wasn’t happening on this big of scale. But I wonder if that’s just the curse of all big communities both on and off the internet.
Thoughts?