This place ahs now become so toxix. seriously i dont understand what any of you are trying to achieve. I have been in the webcomic and webnvoel industry for so long and have paid litreally i think about 100,000 pounds to auhtors through patreons, through ink donations and through commsions and such.
Im sure some of you have even seen me post sevreal times on here, but its not the readers who use the platform that make it toxic, its the auhtors. No one wonder so many people have left this platform. and i shall be doing the same.
You may have originally put proofreader. I can give you the benefit of the doubt for that but
Your original post used the word edited. Some forum regulars can edit titles so they may have seen that and changed it to editor because it seems like that's what you wanted.
Regardless, the rate you're offering is still extremely low for a proofreader.
Im not plying the vitim its true how toxic this comunity has become, when I litreally just was asking for a service. Everything is there in balck and white. Im not lying, i have been open about everything im requesting form the get to go.
Many of my friends have less this paltform because of this and its why Tapas has seen a decline year after year.
I didn;t even go into the fact that the companny you all hate so much. Is one of the major shareholders in Tapas, Wattpad and nearly everyother litreally platform.
There is a reaosn why you are seeing Qidan, orginal webnovel comics start to appear on Tapas. Such as Release that wicth. Legend of the four beasts and so on.
We're not calling you out for lying. We're calling you out for breaking Tapas rules for a start - and for being predatory in what you're expecting in return for the renumeration offered.
False. Tapas' userbase is growing year on year.
Tencent is an investor but from what I can see, has no impact on those company's editorial policies, nor their pay or contracts. Being an investor is not the same as steering a site culture.
Yes there is a reason we're seeing them. They've been ethically licensed and translated by Tapas.
Im not saying that, everything has its plus and downs but you seem to be only looking at the downs. I have never said webnovel is the saint of webcomics, Are thier caluses worse then everyone esles. yes i woudl agree they are and this is mainly because they are chinese focused. and thier reply to that is it works in china.
the problem is for Webnovels. (other then Wattpad) Has the biggist audience. And it terms of paying audience Webnovel is far greater then any other Novel site.
WHat i said is the contract is not as bad as it seems because they take single clasues out of context. Like the fact that you have to write or meet a minum word count wich is not true.
There are around i would say 250 authors who are able to make a living off webnovel. So some people can make it work for them. But just cause it wasn;t a sucess for you, dosnet mean it ownt be for eeveryone.
If i had met you before sighning a contract with webnvoel and you had convinced me to not sighn i woudln;t be in the succfeull postion i am today.
I hope you understand that Blaire hawthorne
and i gave already gotten what i came here for
And THAT is the problem. I work in freelance ghostwriting, where commissions generally come with a set rate from clients if you don't provide your own, and this is by far and away the worst rate I have ever seen offered. If it came to me I would report it on site and make sure my network knew to avoid the person who offered it. If you're able to pay an editor $600+, then the Tapas forums would not be where you sourced editorial resources. There's no proof that you do, but if I'm to take your word for it then it begs the question: how can you only pay proofreaders essentially $0.001 per word, over 10x less than entry-level industry standard.
Because that's the problem here. It's not just that you're offering an exploitative rate, it's that you framed yourself as a legitimate industry creator, which means - to someone who does not know artistic industries - you have positioned your rates as fair. When actual professionals have broken down your points, you've jumped to unsubstantiated excuses around your rates, income, network, and copyright usage. One of those is a red flag. All four is a malicious scheme.
To the writers who have been contacted by @JackSherwin do not accept that offer. If you've signed something already, seek legal aid. If you can't, message me and we'll see what we can do. But I would urge anyone who has read this thread to not take this person seriously under any circumstances and to educate yourself whenever you receive an offer from anyone, be they shady or reputable.