I'll do my best to explain!
I was referring to the QNA tapas is doing, which spotlighting a vast majority of creators who’s comics had nothing to do with their identity. For example, an enby lesbian writing a gay romance story, or a cis pan man writing a trans story, etc.
Rather than giving lgbt+ a chance to talk about their own experiences, you gave lgbt+ people a chance to talk about other people's identities. While having lgbt+ content highlighted in general is always good, pride month has always been about self identity, struggles, and of course pride. It felt, to me at least and to some other creators I talked to, like it was a misstep to channel the resources you had and give platform to something that's based on interpretations of experiences rather than actual real experiences of the lgbt+ people the comics you're promoting and asking questions about are about.
Also, considering the vastness of the lgbt+ community, and the fact all the comics were hand picked, it felt like there was a huge focus on gay (white) men, by which I mean, if I recall correctly, every single comic had a gay white man main character- but not a single comic (as far as I saw) had, say, an asexual character?
I think it's particularly important considering how much of tapas users are younger lgbt+ folk, and how much the community and site thrives on lgbt+ content. Particularly paired with things like the sheer amount of mlm trope-y, rape-romanticizing comics are constantly being pushed by tapas on social media and being bought and presented under tapas premium.
P.S.
If you're going to handpick creators, at least try and make sure they don't post borderline biphobic & aphobic comments on their social media.