67 / 126
Mar 2021

Preventing spam is the likely cause for the app sub threshold, but it still raises the following questions for me:

  • I wonder why they're only hidden from the app's fresh section and not the websites? Logically if new series were hidden on both they would have practically no way to gain traction but it's still curious.

  • I wonder why it is that a larger platform like Webtoons can afford to not have such a restriction in place then? That may very well just come down to them having more staff to catch problematic content, or maybe more users who consistently report it (thus making it easier to find)?

Either way wish it wasn't in place so newbies had a little better shot at finding their audience :sweat_smile: I was lucky and managed to pass the threshold with both of my series relatively quickly via forum networking (the first time) and having a previous readership/other social media networking (this time), but Tapas is small enough a platform that getting over 15 can be hard without outside marketing if you're also not getting your chances on Fresh :confused: Obviously a lot of creators know that outside marketing and networking is a good idea anyways (hence all of the promotion threads, per this thread's topic), but as this threshold isn't detailed anywhere on the website I would imagine a lot of creators are left scratching their heads as to why it's so hard to grow beyond like 5 or 10 subs lol

For my part, the wide majority of the animosity I partook in, or witnessed, was because of the outdated advice that was repeatedly being offered my first few years here. It didn't reflect any of the changing situations at Tapas at the time...or now.

Being told, over and over, that being active on the forums, doing jam comics, and such was the key to success was no longer working then and it isn't working now. Even the shrinking front page space we're fighting for now isn't as effective as it was a few years ago. These are modern problems for small level creators...and we're not finding modern solutions.

I think this happens because these creators shared what worked for them, which may not always be viable because of the changes in the industry. Some of these creators that reached the top "the old way", may not know the new way, or that the way changed at all......

Which was the basis of most of the strife. An insistence that what worked for them should still work for everyone just wasn't practical.

And remember there was also a tangent of folks that didn't believe being promoted on the front page regularly was a factor in their sub-counts.

It didn't matter how often it was articulated that the commentary wasn't on the quality or effort of those creators that reached those levels...it was about the changing system/environment.

Just saying.

But in the end, it is Tapas that created this situation by removing the one visibility opportunity for smaller comics.

I don't think that people are blaming the premium comics. People are just looking for a chance to get their work out there snd Tapas has been making this harder and harder.

I don't think it's that simple though. Even if premium series (the imports and home-grown ones) were separated into their own home page, the community comics would still be populated with algorithmically picked popular and trending titles, ones that often stay perpetually so because the audience votes with their views and interactions. These series are most likely popular elsewhere and bring those numbers in to propel them to the top of Tapas' charts. And staff-picked community creations would still have to meet certain standards, good grammar, art, legibility, episode minimum, nothing outstandingly graphic, etc. People would still be asking for more categories to add, which due to Tapas' staff size would require an immense undertaking.

I talked about this a bit more a year ago (before I became a mod) in this thread when Tapas had their site redesign. Some things have changed certainly, as the context of my old post was a little different, but many things still apply.

Well, I think thst issue here is not one of staff picks and features.

Remember how newly updated pages would show at the bottom of the front page?
That was enough to get eyes on comics.

People could pick up readers on its own merits, not at the whim of an algorythm or if they caught the attention of staff.

It didn't take much real estate and it's not rocket science to implement. It's a simple "These are the latest updated comics".

But that's gone.
Why is that? Why did Tapas remove the one reliable method of visibility?
Was it really that much work to implement amd maintain?

At best, it seems like a strange oversight. At worst, it just feels mean spirited.

That feature has a massive impact. For many, It truly means the difference between building an audience and total obscurity.

The little Fresh section on the homepage, as far as I know, was part of a rotating collection of categories like staff picks and community comics. I don't know if staff plans on putting it back in or are holding off because of the prevalence of spam comics and are working to better weed those out. But every so often the homepage does change and categories are switched up in display and placement. Tapas tracks the numbers and, I would assume, tune future layouts accordingly.

Well, we used to have a newly updated section. If there was a problem with spam comics, that's easily solved by putting a limit of one instance per day.
That section is gone and now we have the problem of visibility.
It does sound like Tapas has no inclination to do anything about it.

It's such a simple thing with the simplest of algorithms.
Webtoon has it. If it was truly a problem, other hosts would've removed it.
This is such a shame.

I've known one or two premium creators, and one thing they all have in common besides being really really lovely is that they all worked super hard on publicity at one point or another. But, [anecdotal evidence] I've known people to put in several times the same effort on products of equal value and achieved a fraction of their success, and that upsets me.

...

I anticipated this point:

here:

...just to elaborate a bit, I'm basically suggesting that next to 'Popular', 'Binge', 'Fresh' etc - not even on the front page - an additional tab exists listing comics sorted according to the algorithm I just described, which would only be populated by comics that are clearly putting in a lot of work, but are not getting recognised. An 'Undiscovered' tab.

Would this end up with "Sanic" levels of content as you implied in the post you linked?
Honestly, I don't believe it would. I don't think the shitposters of Tapas put in that much effort relative to the folks who really deserve to be seen, but aren't being.
I get that there are massive massive issues with effectively trying to quantify 'effort' based on someone's update schedule. But, I believe the benefits of this solution would outweigh that:

  • At its heart, a high ranking under an 'Undiscovered' tab would be something creators could achieve that did not rely on the 'luck' of attention-seeking. Literally every means of gaining audience relies to some extent on luck. Just one place where this wasn't the case, even if it were hidden away, would be such an improvement.

  • If nothing else, the tab would show different comics, that would not be easy to find anywhere other than 'Fresh'.

  • The very nature of an 'Undiscovered' tab would have it that the things at the top probably wouldn't stay there very long as they attracted attention.

  • Because of this, it wouldn't be a substitute for hard work publicising, it would just be "another chance". I get the impression that all some folks want is "just another chance", and that just having that might lessen the need they feel to promote their work in places some folks would rather they didn't.

  • It wouldn't even have to appear on the front page. [anecdotal evidence] People who want 'undiscovered' things are happy to take a few clicks to find them if they know that it can be done. Compare this with my recent exercise writing music as gifts for creators on Tapas for a year where I had to scroll through Fresh for hours on end every time I wanted to find a new comic.

  • The very existence of an 'Undiscovered' tab would address this kind of sentiment:

But those are new comics, not newly updated.
They also look hand picked. I very much doubt that the latest 18 comics to have started all have professional quality art.
What happens once they are no longer visible there?

That still doesn't solve the problem of visibility.

What I see is that Tapas is trying to hide comics it doesn't deem to be up to standard.
It is picking and choosing who gets some visibility while hiding the rest as some embarrassing secret.

What's needed is an impartial way to provide visibility to ALL comics, and Tapas has removed that.

The issue with Fresh is that certain comics can pop up that could get Tapas in trouble if the right set of eyes sees it on the app, since app store rules. Yes, Fresh is unfiltered, anything can show up. Not just mature content that may slip by, but fancomics too. Like browsing fresh right now, I found these two.

That's why the front page is largely curated aside from Popular and Trending, anything featured needs to adhere to certain standards or else Tapas can get in trouble with the app stores, have the app stripped, and will end up stripping visibility from everyone in the end.

Yup, just as I thought XD

This is what happens when comic hosts get too corporate and business like.
I guess creativity has to abide by business rules.

Sounds like we're stuck with the problem then, because as long as the content is filtered, there will always be people who are not going to get a fair go.

I'm going to put on my prediction hat and say we're going to see a movement of underground comics a la 1970's.

An 'Undiscovered' rating would not have this issue.
I'm no statistician, so feel free to call me out on this... but:
In order to calculate a series' consistency, the metric would need to take into account the rate of change of the average length of time between updates. In order to calculate a statistically useful average (let alone rate of change of the average), a comic would need to have some form of consistency for a significant length of time. As a result, a series' consistency rating would change slowly. So, new series would rise to the top of the tab very slowly, making it very easy to human-moderate them.

Additionally, can Tapas not just require users to declare a comic as a fan comic upon creating their series, so that ads can be prevented from displaying alongside them? I used to help moderate an old writing platform that implemented that change in that vein while I was there - it seemed to convince several grumpy copyright-demons to back off.

Use these sites for what they really are. A curated UI that saves you some temporary hassle.

A suggestion like this was brought up before, but the hurdle was that people could just not check a box that their work was a fanwork and lie. And it would be a hassle and turn-off for creators who want to post a new series but have to wait for their submission to be manually reviewed. I doubt Tapas has the people-power to review every new series that's created on a daily basis.

It just takes one series to be spotted for the app store to bring down their hammer. It was a single series that showed a bit of public hair that was reported on the app which brought about the massive audit of all of Tapas' content that led to stricter mature guidelines.

I can't speak on your Undiscovered idea, since I've no experience in coding and making algorithms, so I don't know how feasible it is to even begin tackling something like that at this time for the Tapas team.

That makes sense.

I wish that Tapas was more upfront and transparent with its decisions.
It does seem that they rather avoid the issue rather than being honest as to why they are doing things.
It's probably one of the reasons why my view of this platform has soured over the years.
They really seem to have an issue with just being open and honest.

I considered the lying problem.
I don't think users have any incentive to lie.
If Tapas made it possible to filter any tab/search result to 'fan works only', and replace 'genre' with 'fandom' when publishing fan works, it would make fan works significantly easier to find. It would be within the interests of fan creators to tag their works properly, as then the people looking for them could find them much more easily.
As such, it would not be unreasonable to make incorrectly labelling fan content against Tapas' Ts+Cs.
It would also be easier for copyright holders to locate fan works of their IPs and request their removal. By 'burying' them as it does presently, Tapas succeeds in both doing a disservice to fan creators by displaying their work in places it isn't entirely welcome, and looking very shifty to IP holders.

I have coded some algorithms in my time, and I have developed apps for almost two years now. But I'd still consider myself mostly a novice.
By my knowledge an Undiscovered tab could be hard-coded, unlike a popular or trending tab, which is likely to make use of some machine learning. I'm not sure if Tapas' popularity algorithms rely on AI - they don't particularly need to since relatively speaking there isn't that much content compared with say, Reddit, Instagram, YouTube, tumblr etc. But, most algorithms of that sort do, making them all massive resource-hogs. An 'Undiscovered' algorithm would not need that.

An 'Undiscovered' tab would rely purely on metrics that would all be computationally very simple to calculate like (for example) the rate of change of the average length of time between updates, or how quickly a creator replies to comments, the average length of those replies etc. - data Tapas already has, smooshed together with some elementary maths.

Things like likes and subs all write into the database in as close to real time as possible. When I click like and reload the page, the like is there. The metrics that made up a consistency score wouldn't be like this, because:

  • It would be possible to calculate some of the score/estimate the score in advance when a user schedules updates in advance. This would make it possible to predict the Undiscovered tab in advance. As one moderator to another... being able to predict problems ahead of time... that's the dream, right?
  • It would change extremely slowly on account of relying on the trends in the changes of averages over the course of many weeks, meaning Tapas' servers could run many of the calculations as a weekly background job during their least active hours, as opposed to running them in as close to real time as possible like how they handle uploads and payments etc.
  • It would only be necessary to calculate the score for series that are 'active' and have been active for a predetermined length of time, that fall within the least popular quartile of series, meaning that only a very small number of series would need have a full consistency score calculated at all each week. In fact, this score need only be calculated for some 100-200 series each week.

Overall we're talking a scheduled job in the back end consisting of a few thousand good, old fashioned database queries and some elementary mathematics. To design the new creator dashboard will have taken orders of magnitude more developer time. The servers cope with more in a couple of minutes than calculating this metric would take in a month.
The biggest challenges would come in fine-tuning it, which would take time, but then that's true for every new feature in a piece of code.

Championing indie comics is in Tapas' brand image (even if some folks in this thread feel y'all haven't lived up to that), so Undiscovered would look very good indeed from that perspective, and no other platform offers it, so even better. A decent developer could get a version of this feature up and running in a week - a reasonable price to pay considering everything it could offer.

What could it offer?
I've already hinted at the consistency score's ability to be predicted in advance because of Tapas' episode scheduling functionality. Additionally, it would directly cause attention to go towards good things without much attention.The 'undiscovered' tab then would surely draw a certain allure to it.

In the UK in the 80s and 90s there was a radio presenter called John Peel, who was notorious for playing unsolicited submissions. He became so influential that record labels offered deals to artists who were played by him. As such, listening to the 'Peel Sessions' became a tool for predicting who the music industry was about to discover, and so became extremely fashionable.

... I just want to put it out there that maybe having not only the only Undiscovered tab in the business but the episode release schedules that allow you to predict what it will come up with next might be very useful indeed.

Small rant

Why these kind of topics always at some point devolve into "My series deserves better because it's better, because I am a professional, and because I take it very seriously"? As if none of the other series(popular or not) are better, made by professionals, and taken very seriously? These kind of people always say "Tapas owes you nothing" when other people are complaining about their series lack of success. When it comes to their own series, Tapas suddenly owes them everything as if their series are #1 Tapas most-read series. Which one is the correct one?


That aside, I am relieved that Staff's Pick is back and is put up there! I am not too hopeful to get my own series on it (and it would be detrimental for Tapas for featuring such unprofessional unpolished shit :upside_down:), but at least the section is back to help the tiny chance community creators have! I wish this section can be more developed in the future!

Also how long is the time consideration for a series to be put in "New from the community?" I kinda wish there is a clear guidelines for every community-geared features, with a description of what that is and its purpose. So creators can now what to do to up their chance to be featured and if they eligible, and readers can know what it is behind those selection. It can straighten misunderstanding or unfairness, as I myself have been staff's picked where I shouldn't and it felt unfair.

I kinda feel up for now that the mechanism or criteria for Staff's Pick and Seasonal Features (like the previous Women's History Month) is enigmatic. I have seen people voicing their displeasure about it, which while it confused and disappointed me too (I did not pitch, so this isn't about me), I can accept an explanation. I also feel disappointed that the last feature is not cycled, as IIRC it was written as such in announcement (CMIIW). Those features can be the only hope for community creators who aren't new, and it is no shit that being on the front page will boost your readership. Some transparency and extra space for it would be better.

Lastly, I kinda think premium series should not be in staff's pick. I have seen multiple times when the series featured in those huge front page banner is also in staff's pick and thought "Wow that's putting a hat on a hat." I am fully aware that premium series≠popularity and success (I have seen premium series with worse stats that mine), but the spot used to feature a popular premium series in the Staff's Pick (which often have been featured somewhere else) is better being used for community or smaller premiums.