Oh no, i didn't mean the fetishization XD yea that's sucky. But that's my personal opinion, and I'm not afraid of going against "a lot of people".
Nor will I go to bat for "Blue" haha, it was an example of a sex-positive, sex-intensive work that's supposedly literary, and supposedly not porn.
Your view, a valid one, is infact similar to the BL discussion this topic is having right now. "Lots of people" think BL is a porn-like ghetto, while "a lot of people" would argue the genre tag shouldn't matter as a description of literary quality.
And I tend to be a seperate art from the creation and creator type person.
Did you know David Bowie was a child rapist? He also inspired an undeniable amount of science fiction and video games.
Can someone be terrible as a person in the past (or present), and inspiring as an artist? Bowie implies yes.
Should we muddle the discussion of artistic merit with moral bankruptcy, I think no.
In this case we're purely discussion the BL label, which lead to a discussion of the legitimacy of the Palme D'Or winning "Blue is the Warmest Color" example. A film that led to my appreciation of the nuances of the LGBTQ world, and led me to a more tolerant and appreciative worldview.
All of the above muddles the discussion of BL labels on Tapastic.
But again feel free to disagree tho.