Yeah, thatās weird. I never understood that kind of attachment. Iām of the opinion all creators are (or should be) sadists on some level - be it by using emotional torment, physical, or whatever.
Like I love my characters to bits and thatās exactly why I want to torture them in various ways. I even feel the same about characters who are not mine - I want to see them suffer and canāt understand the whole āuwu domestic fluffy no badness all is good and pureā stuff. Iād much rather see characters suffer because itās far more interesting, engaging, and evokes a stronger emotional response from me.
If a creator isnāt sadistic or cruel then... whatās the point?
Tho again I wanna clarify āsadisticā can mean a lot of things in this context. Even mild conflict is hurting your characters in some way - even if your story is otherwise light and fluffy. Basically Iām saying a story needs good and bad, light and dark, gray areas, conflict, etc. because otherwise whatās the point? And when I say āconflictā I donāt mean like those ones where some strawman pops up, gives hell to the protagonist, and the protagonist either doesnāt care or has no internal conflict or they just school the strawman and walk away like they think theyāre hot shit. Thatās not conflict. Thatās more of a pointless lecture.
Anyway I think thereās this idea that hurt, pain, conflict, etc are inherently bad - even in fiction - and some people want to completely avoid those things. People are weird.
EDIT: Gag comics are more or less an exception but even then Iāve seen many where the main characters get dragged and their suffering / current conflict is funny.