Welcome to Tapastic! I hope you'll enjoy your time here!
Whether digital or traditional, they're both means of expression to tell a visual, sequential story. There's not that much difference with technological development these days either, though working on things digitally tends to be less expensive and provides that all-important undo (as has been mentioned!), which can make things so much easier and also save work that otherwise might be ruined. I used to do traditional-only and scanned it in, then I went to digital finishes with advances in lettering and other things. Finally, I went entirely digital because, even with good posture practices and careful working, my back and shoulders were ultimately unable to maintain the positions needed due to some injury.
It's just so much easier to maintain good posture for me, as well as work more efficiently, when I'm doing things digitally. Plus, when space is at a premium, it's much easier to store digital files than it is physical works. Especially if you work in large sizes.
I don't think there's any more (or less!) respectability in working traditionally or digitally. The way I see it, people should do what they're most comfortable doing and what will enable them to create as robustly as they want for the story they want to tell. It's not cheating at all to use what resources are at your disposal, I think.
There's so much out there in all media. It used to be a lot more trouble to do things from the start -- initially, the lines didn't feel right, until I found Clip Studio Paint, which works very well with my approach and tools. But now that everything is much more accessible, I find working digitally to be more suited to my needs.