The whole "test" was based on a cynical joke strip, and it's really become overblown. As someone has noted (and correctly), The Bikini Carwash Company passes the test as-is, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's an egalitarian oeuvre.
The strip, as I recall, was talking about Alien. Alien is a notable film for a number of reasons, but one of those is that during the scripting phase, the characters were referred to by surnames only and did not have gender attributed to them until the parts were cast, which was by who seemed to fit the role best. All of the characters had more going on than fixating on someone of another gender (and in the original script, it was discussed that due to the long hauls the characters did, they tended to help each other out in the intimacy department).
I do applaud efforts to introduce more diversity organically into storytelling, but I think this would be better retooled into something more helpful to creators and the creative process. Like asking, for example:
-
Do your characters have lives outside of the main conflict, or do they exist only for the main character? It's a tempting tendency to have characters outside of the protagonist be basically window-dressing and nothing more. If characters never show any personality besides their function as accessories to the main protagonist or perfunctory roles to advance the plot, it may be worthwhile to think about developing them a bit more.
-
Are they defined by their gender, ethnicity, or something like that? It's an unfortunate tendency, especially in American superhero-genre comics, for characters to act as "examples" based on one or two social labels. Does the character have more to them than that, or are they just a "poster child" for one or more social labels?
-
Are you conflating race with ethnicity? They are not the same thing, and wiping out or denying a character's ethnic, social, or cultural heritage based on their appearance or skin tone is not only not okay, it's limiting in terms of narrative too.
And perhaps most important of all:
-
Do you enjoy writing the character? Because if not, maybe you should concentrate on characters you enjoy writing. Just tossing in characters because you think it's expected, to try and diversify, can lead to exploitative presentation, and it can cause resentment both in the author and readers.
I am glad it was pointed out that the Bechdel question is a bit long in the tooth by now. I just wish we could come up with some solid questions that would help creators to be mindful of what they're creating and why. There's no such thing as a foolproof test, but by asking questions and using a fairly Socratic approach, we surely can help creators to strengthen and develop their creations.