Bro, you really went all out with your critique—respect for that! I can see what you were trying to tell me, and I appreciate the effort. Let me address some of your points with my perspective:
Naming Characters:
I’ve avoided naming characters right after their introduction because it can feel like the author is breaking the fourth wall and saying, "Hey readers, this guy's name is alex!" I wanted the names to flow naturally within the story, rather than feeling forced.
Cedric's Trust Issue:
Ah, the Cedric part—good catch, but let me clarify: Cedric trusted the driver, only to realize later that trust was misplaced. It's not negligence; it’s betrayal. I guess I could make that clearer in the narrative so it doesn’t seem like Cedric’s being irresponsible.
Dialogue:
As for the dialogue, I get your point about making it sharper, but humans don’t always talk like that. Real conversations have pauses, filler words, and quirks—it’s what makes them sound authentic. That said, I’ll work on balancing natural flow with storytelling impact.
Descriptions and Pacing:
I tried not to overload readers with details upfront because I thought spacing them out would build intrigue. But I get your point about pacing—I’ll rethink whether the early scenes could be tightened up without losing depth.
Honestly, your feedback has been super helpful, and I really appreciate you taking the time to analyze my work. I’m new to this and still learning the ropes, so I’m sorry if parts of the story felt unworthy of your time. Thanks again for helping me grow as a writer!