I can see where you're coming from, but I believe that by modern standards, Da Vinci wouldn't be considered a fine artist, but an Illustrator or even an illustrator/designer. My reasoning being that his art was mostly portraits of people, designs for machinery and anatomical diagrams. Most fine artists nowadays make much more conceptual work, like abstract sculptures and things designed not to be a recognisable drawing of a person or thing so much as a talking point or to spark thought, while for a careful likeness of a person, you'd go to an illustrator.
I picked Da Vinci because there is absolutely no question that he is definitely objectively a 10 in anatomical drawing, draftsmanship, composition, value, layout, expression etc. and also everyone has definitely heard of him. I'd also rather not give any ratings, high or low, to specific living artists, especially ones on the same platform as me, like wlop.
I think if my comparison was with the best possible digital comic artists who are absolute masters of their field in comics specifically, I'd probably still rate myself around a 7.5 - 8. Not top tier, but reasonably pro standard and with visual storytelling skills and dynamic anatomical drawing that other pros compliment me on. So not much changes really, I'm still "decent but not the best".