this applies to fantasy as well, but the oppression analogy
not metaphor, not oppression as story/plot, but specifically 'oh, these robots are black people. thats what this analogy is. that robot? thats robot rosa parks. this is robot civil rights. wait what did that one robot blowing up represent???' coughdetroitbecomehumancough coughbrightcough coughalsodistrictninebutifuckinglikedistrictninesoignorethatone (this also applies to cleverman, where the hairypeople are like. literally aboriginal but cleverman did it right imo by integrating all of it into Actual Real aboriginal rights in australia. tho it was still very 'this thing happening to the hairypeople? this thing happened to Actual Real aboriginal people')
its a weird paint-by-numbers approach to social commentary that i see more often in reader interpretation than in the actual work. you can create a story that explores how society as-is would integrate smth fictional into their world - a la in the flesh or district nine or, idk, the x-men - and then people can start trying to figure out if youre talking abt race or homophobia or disability. i think a better way to read and write these stories as a unique exploration of how a culture categorises and treats the other without tacking it to any one realworld example.
also a lot of these stories - like the x-men - have a prevalence of people who dont experience much realworld oppression, being mostly straight white people, which makes the entire thing flimsy.
also, robot tiddies.