Why didn't Tapas prioritize fixing the glaring issue of sexual violence and consensual sexual content being shoved into the same category? I get a discussion about the other misworded categories was necessary, but that could just as well have happened after the worst problem was fixed.
I understand it may feel like a waste of company time to go in on two different occasions to fix issues with the same feature, but let me put it into perspective for you:
Readers right now can click on an episode expecting consensual content, and getting rape instead. Since the potential trigger warning for rape is already in the mature content warning category used, users that produce content involving rape might choose to skip in-episode warnings.
And, as an author, I have to put my consensual sexual content - which, mind you, I started making as a way to regain sexual power and heal my wounds as a grooming survivor - in a category specifically worded to include rape and sexual abuse. That hurts, and both of these combined leave a pretty sour taste for users.
These things were not only ignored upon launching, but also deprioritized and left to sit for an unnecessary amount of time once they were pointed out by users. Think about what impression people get of tapas' priorities when they see that.