"PG13" level comics getting removed from the app

[skicoak]

Da Faq?!? The ad for Let's Play got hit?!?

The AD?!?

[joannekwan]

I mean, they could also contact the staff to find out what's wrong with that image or case specifically instead of shitting on Tap. It says in the e-mail Tap staff is open to conversation. god >:T
For all they know it could be a mistake by whatever algorithm flagged everything in the first place.

[joannekwan]

On another note, I know Tapas wants to play it safe as Apple has threatened to remove the app from the store before, BUT damn, if I were in the same position, I would reinstate @keii4ii's hairy men and go through each flagged case myself.

I will challenge you, Apple.

[keii4ii]

I applaud your noble cause and spirit. But really, I'm not angry, just sad. This is just one of the 100 things that made me feel like I don't belong... and Apple has nothing to do with the other 99 things. I also wouldn't want angry attention on my work, even if that anger isn't directed at me/my work XD

For anyone else affected by this who wants to fight it, though, I hope everything goes as smoothly as possible. I hope the same for the Tapas staff as well.

[akemikae]

If a site wants to block my comic for saying fuck (which I do not shy away from) they can have at it. If I'm writing a story about teenage boys that have a tendency to be crude, I'm not going to prevent them from swearing. It would ruin the characterization.

Same is the case where people are having to censor gasp BODY HAIR? I honestly cannot fathom what kind of nonsense is going through the owner of Apple to think that any of this is okay. It's a shit ton of artists being targeted as well. So much for letting us have artistic integrity. :I

[joannekwan]

Aw thanks. You DO belong though! You've been in this game so long! I remember when I just started out and you were one of the regular faces I came to know and respect here. <3

I do wonder though if whatever algorithm was used to flag all these series isn't somewhat flawed though, like tumblr's sweep. And in tumblr's case, the feature to challenge each flagged post's case was quite useful. I got all of my posts that were wrongly flagged reinstated.

[SuperRazz]

BODY HAIR?! that sucks. If body hair is grounds for removing a comic, then I'm in danger. I have a future episode with a panel showing a character that has cleavage and another panel w/ implicit sex . I guess I should remove it

and Let's play isn't even "overtly sexual or pornographic". Apple, 12 year olds already know what sex is. Censorship is useless

[joannekwan]

I wouldn't censor anything myself unless its already been flagged. You may get away with it?
I was always of the mindset of just posting something first (within reason, following Tap's own guidelines, of course) and then get warned about it later, then choose to comply or not.

[skicoak]

I mean, they could also contact the staff to find out what's wrong with that image or case specifically instead of shitting on Tap.

It flagged an ad for having "Overtly sexual or pornographic material" and "Realistic portrayals of people or animals being killed".

It flagged THIS ad for that.

I understand the desire to defend Tapas but come on... They need to take some heat on this too.

Does this look like the result of getting in the trenches and fighting for the creators? Either these flagged series are being notified by an automated process which Tapas isn't reviewing or they were unable to convince Apple that this ad wasn't porn/snuff images...neither is a good look for Tapas.

[joannekwan]

I know, I checked out the twitter thread. I still think it's some mistake by whatever image-mapping or tag-seeking algorithm Apple is using. Tapas gets stuck as the middle man, relaying what Apple caught to their users, automatically, and not being able to go through it as a case by case basis with less than 20 people on staff to sort through all these until the creator e-mails them back to ask for specifics.

EDIT: Could also be as this person suggested

I dunno, I just think it's a bad look publicly calling out a small company for what could very well be a legit mistake without trying to work the problem out first via e-mail, which Tapas welcomes.

[vothnthorvaldson]

I also think Tapas is not responsible. Yes, they are not doing all that they could potentially do, but IMO it's because they are overwhelmed. We can't really blame them for not having on-call staff dedicated to dealing with other's companies' outrageous decisions.

[joannekwan]

Yeah. Like they could hire temp editors/contact people to help go through all the cases.

-raises hand-

[skicoak]

Yes, they are not doing all that they could potentially do, but IMO it's because they are overwhelmed.

So they're passing the bans down to the creators as is...then they'll review them if the creator complains?

That doesn't make any sense logistically.

[joannekwan]

They might be going through all of them? And expediting cases where creators e-mail back.
I'm guessing the choice was either to accept Apple's wide-ass sweep or have the app removed. So they chose the sweep and are going through it little by little.

[therealbereth]

Wow, I JUST saw this. Body hair? Are they for real?

I assumed it concerned overtly violent and/or sexual content, but with examples like these here, all of us could get randomly hit by an automated ban, what the hell.

Time to build our own websites again, it seems. If all these apps just (have to) censor us, what's even the point? Seriously. Build a following with what's available and then hope for the best when you send people the link to your own page, where you can actually post your uncensored content. Sounds like the most business-savvy way to me right now.

This is ridiculous.

[skicoak]

Mongrelmarie...got that notification sent to her already.

It cleared whatever the process is. That means the process is all the weakness in resisting Apple or faulty in catching errors though .

Either way, Tapas has to accept some blame.

[joannekwan]

For all we know, Apple's process could be the same as tumblr used in detecting nude bodies and whatnot.
Computers are dumb so the process is definitely faulty.

I'm just saying Tap probably had no say about that process and had to defer to it.

[skicoak]

Okay...if they deferred to the process, then they're not going to "fight" that the ad/image doesn't contain any sexual content or animal/human deaths?

Mongrelnarie would be expected to alter it... How?

[joannekwan]

They might fight it if it was brought to their attention via direct e-mail?
I don't know how often Tap staff checks twitter, especially with all this going on.

[skicoak]

So they "might" fight things if the creator's bounce it back to them?

That's just transferring burden to the creators.