@TheLemmaLlama @11keys
I shall join the ranks of my chaotic writing brethren in the writing lands devoid of outlines and plans.
Probably the best example of my writing would come from the first story in my series of shorts 'Letters from the Sleepless'. So here goes a breakdown of my chaos:
1) I start with an idea - not even an important scene I want, it could be just a line of dialogue I want to build a story around. For this particular short, the idea was a desire to contextualize a fear of going to sleep and waking up as someone else
2) After letting it unconsciously ferment in my mind, I sit down and write. Normally I need to do this in one sitting or else it just doesn't work (for longer stuff I can break down the sittings into chapters to make it manageable)
3) Editing and proofreading occur during the writing process, which yes means a lot of on-the-fly rewrites - imagine putting together a large puzzle with only having a hazy memory of what the final image should be. When I get up and close the file it is a 'finished project' in my mind.
4) Last is to bother someone to act as a second pair of eyes, which tends to annoy them since I usually just do a complete rewrite to handle any editorial remarks - going back to the puzzle allegory it'd be like if someone mentioned they thought a piece should be a couple spaces over and my response is 'okeydokey guess we're redoing this puzzle!' (This particular story went through 3 iterations; I'm working on improving this aspect of the process - i swear)
I do want to clarify the last point that it's not an issue of being able to take criticism, it's more a mental thing where since I view the works as finished products unto of themselves, I find it easier to make something 'new' than fix the issues. Like if I made a cake and people complained the cake was too sweet. If my story was the cake, it would be infinitely easier to make a new cake than remove sugar from the already baked dough.
Somehow this process has also gotten me through my research career so far ...