this thread is devolving to me and these two it seems. im not gonna reply to either of them anymore so hopefully well get away from this tangent
Some conversations are turning a bit in circles now.
Let's return to discuss the original youtube video if possible.
Considering you highlighted it when you quoted me, not sure if you missed the fact that I said I hated Lord of the Rings "as a kid"
I often relate to characters who differ from me and I don't always relate to characters who are the same gender, race, orientation as me. But I do tend to enjoy stories with characters that span a range of different genders and races over stories where all the characters are similar in those aspects. And I think it's important for kids to be able to see characters that share their traits fulfilling all kinds of roles. I don't consider diversity to be pandering but rather realistic in most stories where the character variation isn't limited due to some plot situation. Characters shouldn't have to be female or a poc due to "SJW" pandering, characters should be varied because humans as a species show a lot of variation.
Making a character a woman or a different race shouldn't excuse the writer from making them a developed character with a personality outside of that. In fact that's part of the problem when a cast has just one female character as being "the girl" often becomes her only personality trait since that is enough to make her different from the rest of the cast. Luckily this trend is fading away along with the trend of the token poc and token gay person... in large part due to media becoming more diverse and the novelty of a character being female, queer, or a poc no longer being seen as enough to make them interesting/different.
There are bad writers with diverse casts and bad writers with uniform casts. Those writers are going to make flat characters. I'm not saying making a flat character a woman or a person of color or lgbtq will save them from being flat. But if someone is a good writer who creates well developed characters but next to none of them are female or the female characters are not as developed or as interesting as the male characters, then that might be an issue and I would hope most of us could agree on that.
ok to return to the original video, what do you guys think about taking marketing courses and buisness corses for making webcomics?
I'm all for it personally. I think learning the business would help webcomics succeed as an industry of its own.
That may be your experience, but it's not a common experience.
I wish it wasn't like this. I really really wish it wasn't. But, my own experiences have been very similar.
I stopped reading fantasy novels for a long time because I couldn't find any fantasy novels with female main characters at my library, barely any of them even had female side-characters. I wanted to read more girls so I started reading YA novels because those seemed to have more girls doing cool stuff. I loved fantasy novels and I devoured the few ones with female main characters that came out a couple of years later. But, I still stopped reading fantasy for a long time because all the characters in them were very tiringly male and I was tired of reading stories about just men.
When your gender takes up more than half the Earth's population but seems to only take up very tiny parts in the books that you read... That gets very tiring after a while.
So long as you could find a class where the information was broad enough that you could apply it to your comics, it sounds like a great idea. Something focused on digital marketing and branding might be the most helpful? Unless you could find a class specifically on marketing yourself as an artist.
When I was in school for illustration we had lectures about web presence, social media, branding, and promotional materials (both digital and print) and I still use the info I learned all the time!
ive heard of a lot of degrees that teach this these days! its probably more prominent in the 'art with a job to do' side than in fine art, but i dont know for sure... theres also courses some places specifically on business within the arts (although in that case, its stretched from theatre to illustration to music and back)
yeah web marketing would be a great for us specificaly, also I have been in a basic marketing class (just simple stuff and mostly traditional) and I do find it helpfull in marketing my comic from time to time, maybe sombody could post their notes from these clases like they did with the college comic clases
fine arts is also part of the marketing spectrums since you have to make it so people actually asociate your brand as fine art
of course, of course, but i dont know if as many fine art courses dedicate time to teaching their students marketing and business as illustration or graphic design courses do
oh no perish the thought, I think in that case those courses should be diffrent, I don't want to go to a fine arts and traditinal painting class or course and see market theory, that's what the marketing classes and courses are for, now if the colleges of fine art don't put those courses in the curiculum(don't know if that's the right word) then their very slow on the uptake
okay this is just a miscommunication bc university is run differently in the UK. over here, you take A Course and that course covers everything youre gonna learn at uni besides how to get really drunk. so thats how i was phrasing it. i dont expect a degree composited of various classes to have a fine art class that has marketing thrown in.
ah ok, no in Mexico we have a carreare and in it they put diffrent clases about diffrent things, from math to social culture and history, we have this paper called pensum and that tells us what kind of clases we have to pass to be able to graduate, don't know if the UK has a similar system, also we don't have drunk courses we know how to drink comming from the womb XD
haha no in the UK you select a course at university, and that one course is in one thing. for example, you select the 7 year fine art course at edinburgh - totally different to the 3 year fine art course at leeds, or something - and you have a course runner who decides what the course covers - and thats all you get. that might include an economics class or module, but its all in the one course.
and ofc theres no getting drunk courses, its just that people get drunk a lot in their free time lmao
I'm getting drunk right now (beer on the table) also yeah carrears differ uni from uni here too, but not to that degree XD and there should be some drunk courses cause some people really need to learn how to hold their liquor (yours truly included)
Maybe someone should have told my classmates that... They seemed to think that the "Writing for the Stage" class meant "getting drunk off your face at 4 in the afternoon"...
No, most fantasy stories aren't primarily about humans. Or at very least they aren't all just about humans with one token elf* lady thrown is as a love interest *(I mean sure, LOTR but the main cast wasn't all humans is what I'm getting at). Yes hetereosexuality is more common but why is it a male main character with a female interest instead of the other way round? Why can't some of the other characters who aren't love interests be women? Sure if we're talking about the past of course the lack of diversity makes sense because people then didn't think those people's stories were worth telling to the majority, and somehow they're still not important enough to even grace side characters? Even those this persecution is apparently over? How can both of these things simultaneously be true?
(you're entering stereotype territory)
There is both the stereotype that women like feminine things and the stereotype that women reject feminine things. I like the color pink and pastels and romance and cute things, am I a stereotype? I also used to pretend to hate the color pink and I didn't ever wear makeup and don't dress traditionally feminine, was I a stereotype then? I mean I still don't dress femininely or wear makeup, does that mean I've gotten over worrying about stereotypes and was I reacting to stereotypes before? What does that tell you about me? And what would your interpretation of me tell me about you? You see how layered this is?
Some people fit into stereotypes and some of those people reject them or embrace them. I've spoken to gay people that used to over embrace the super feminine stereotype of gayness because they felt obligated to, and others that rejected it completely because the last thing they ever wanted to be was another negative stereotype. There are stereotypes that say gamers are fat white males, how do you think an actual fat person feels about video games? Maybe they hide their interest because they're afraid of being a stereotype or maybe they embrace it even though they don't actually like games that much. What if they're also white? What if they're not? What if they're female? Or the stereotype that women who like video games are either sexy bimbos that are fake geeks or ugly real geeks. Do you think some ugly women might avoid games? What about a beautiful woman?
I'm not saying that you should reduce a character to a stereotype, you should never do that, but I am saying that for me, my character's relationship and feelings about the stereotypes that apply to them are important to me understanding my characters. Its because I want to avoid making making stereotypical caricatures that I consider these things in depth. It's hard to write characters that are vastly different from me but honestly I'd rather make mistakes and apologize and then get better at writing them then just never write a character that isn't my race, gender, religion and sexuality. It doesn't mean stories about characters like that are inherently bad but I feel like it robs me of plot and story opportunities. The stories I want to tell, and the stories I want to read involve these things.
*edited for clarity