23 / 31
Jul 2020

Working out that your opponent is causing a five second lag to your vision (which by the way would induce serious motion sickness in most people as your vision went out of sync with your movement) while in a frantic fight (and five seconds is a really long time in a fight, you could have easily just been stabbed or shot or punched out during that time) and closing your eyes to combat it, and not only that but then fighting blind would require the person to be incredibly smart, perceptive and quick thinking and also an incredible superhuman fighter. I haven't seen a lot of blind karate champions winning Olympic gold medals. If you were Daredevil with his superhuman senses that act like sonar and kind of allow him to "see", sure, but it's a better villain power exactly because you couldn't have every major antagonist the hero met have blind-fighting skills to stop him just running up and putting handcuffs on them before they even worked out what was happening or it'd get boring.

It's not a flexible power to build lots of interesting scenarios around. You can't rescue people from a burning building with it, or get across the city fast, or sense danger etc. It'd become a boring power in a narrative sense pretty quickly.

Good point, maybe it would be more fitting to name it "sight manipulation" or "sightbending".

Makes sense to me - your brain processes images because light enters the eye. Manipulate the light and you manipulate what your brain sees. Same reason I see a dancer in your post but there's not a dancer actually in front of me, it's just light from my computer monitor.

This does provide more useful information for how this power can be used though. Does this person's power only slow down light or can it do other things to light? If it only slows, does it only slow down light as it's entering people's eyes? There are a number of implications that you can come to when you drill into how specifically your power works. Not saying it's better or worse to make the power more specific, but if you're the type of writer who can make it work, there's a lot to be gained from going down this line of thought.

I am not an expert in physics but I think that if you slow down light, it does not slow down processing or time, instead it just distorts the light. The ghosting in the image I posted is the result of manipulating time. So it would make more sense if the character moved super fast or if they could freeze time.

If the light reaching the person`s eye is slowed down, it would result in an interval where the person cant see because the light hasnt reached the eye in the first place. That doesnt slow down the perception of time. If you close your eyes, you can still count ten seconds accurately, for example.

Depending on how drastic and frequent are the changes of light, it could be the doom against oponents with epillepsia and it would be a real pain to rely on sight against said opponent.

I agree. Making the target's brain process light slower would be influencing the brain instead. Light manipulation would be distorting it (the light) as @NickRowler said.

Yeah maybe I should change it so that instead of slowing down light, it slows down the processing of the brain's visual cortex.

Right, you make a good point(NickRowler too). I admit, I was thinking in terms of my audience brain instead of my scientific brain - these sorts of explanations work if you just need to handwave an explanation for why a person can do what they do instead of just having it happen. But I'm a proponent of the idea that you don't need to be fully scientifically accurate in your explanations to create an engrossing story - you can always have some expository character say "In layman's terms, what they do is 'slow down' the light entering their eye, though scientifically that's not accurate at all' - as long as the science itself isn't the focus of the scene and you don't contradict your own established rules. I'm simplifying a whole theory of writing into a couple sentences, but hopefully it's clear enough so far.

My issue with responses like "Make it a psychic thing instead of a light thing" is that it feels like it's getting close to saying "just write a different thing." dongsunpai wasn't specific on what part of their idea they were most invested in, whether it was the nature of it being light based or just the perception altering aspect, but I'd say the crux of my advice is more "If you can come up with new and exciting ways to apply this ability to different circumstances, the ability itself doesn't necessarily matter."

If you want to stay with the concept of light, you could have them manipulating light to make an optical illusion.

How relevant is scientifical accuracy depends of the degree of realism of the story. While some stories make science step aside for the sake of "rule of cool", science can also be a tool to make a power way cooler. A solid example of this are all the clever aplications of alchemy on Full Metal Alchemist. Clever use of science in powers adds a strategic layer in combat that is really satisfying to watch.

Is truth that what matters is how the power is used, but depending on what you establish as the power makes some uses more or less beleivable.

It depends mostly of the uses granted to the power how much it changes things.

I... don't think they were attempting to steal though? They were most likely bringing up a potential idea for what kind of character would use such a power.

to properly answer this question, let`s see your description:

According to that description, it does seem to have some similarities with King Crimsom in the way it affects the perception of time, but without cutting away the existance of said interval of time. To differentiate it, you can set some limitations and/or figure other uses for it.

Now, that being said, dont feel down if a power you make has some similarities to powers in other stories. There is a reason there are many stories with people with super strenght or fire powers among others. A power is not the only element that defines a character.