Obviously, I like all the comments, where people point out that they like something from the new issue or info page. Also I'm glad to see when they say that they are glad to finally see the new issue and are waiting for the new ones. (˵ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°˵)
I really haven't expected so much engagement from readers. I'm touched and happy to see it (╥﹏╥)
Also I was really surprised and glad to see an interest for info sheets. To be honest, I didn't expect that so many of readers will actually read them and ask questions.
Here are two the most smart questions, I've gotten:


First one made me seriously think how to limit S.M.A.R.T. capabilities, so this weapons wouldn't become godlike. If S.M.A.R.T. really could morph into everything, it would make all the other weapons unnecessary. But I don't want it, because I want to add a bunch of other interesting weapons in setting.
So... I've came up with the answer, how to introduce these limits, adding limitations at the level of bonds between nanoparticles. I can deduce, in which neighborhood of its primal form a weapon could change its shape, if we allow only particular limited angles and bonds lengths, and would forbid the particles to change their neighbours. As an alternative - we would allow them to change neighbours, but only from some subset (for example, we could say that a particle can bond only with neighbours, which were at two (three) "handshakes" from it at the primal form of weapon).
But while such a limitations make clear, that the weapon's shape should remain singly connected (i.e. we have topological limitations instantly), I can proof that weapon can't go outside some neighborhood of its primal shape (i.e. proof geometric limitations!), but only with diving into high math! I should at least take a limit (in math sence) at some point... 0_o Now I should think, how to get rid of too much math and make it understandable for not-math reader... It revealed to be a really fun riddle. 
Sorry for the rant and all these overwhelming details...
I just wanted to say that sometimes reader's comments make me go into deep and very fun reasonings!
I like it.