This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Vampire's definition had evolved a lot, there are more movies of romance of a vampire with a "young girl" before Twlight, just Twilight got more popular. But like Twlight ruinning vampires I would say no, more stuff came before. Just Twlight set up the vampires for teens (either if it did it good or bad).
I still have my book from Bram Stoker's Dracula and still enjoy it xD (if we see about literature composition, obviously, I stay with Dracula)
And like someone said up here, there's also Vampire Knight xD
I find it kind of funny Dracula gets a lot of praise and even if i have a copy of the book, I found it tedious, preachy and boring to read. I preferred Frankenstein loads more in terms of narrative and pacing |D
But yeah, most of the big change in vampires in making them more human or exploring their pain comes from Anne Rice's works. And even if I think they haven't aged very well (minus the lore), they made a huge impact. Regardless, people still wrote about vampires being mindless killers, or just focusing on vampires co-existing without the trauma, and such.
The genre is so varied, I don't think anything can ever fully define it. It's what makes it great
Even though I bring up Dracula quite a bit as an example since it's the vampire story everyone knows about, it's actually not my favorite either. I like parts of it and respect it for making the type of vampire most are familiar with now, but it's still not my favorite.
(...and of all the Dracula movie adaptations, I prefer the rip-off counterpart Nosferatu. XD)
(...and of all the Dracula movie adaptations, I prefer the rip-off counterpart Nosferatu. XD)
Right?? Nosferatu is really fun, and without it we wouldn't have the 'dies by sunlight' trope which tbh I enjoy it. I find it ridiculously funny for traveling-vampire stories where they have to worry about time zones and sunrise/set times.
If we're going down this route of "did a single work of fiction ruin vampires?", I'm going to say no, Twilight didn't ruin vampires. Every single popular modern vampire novel has ruined vampires. Bram Stoker romanticised vampires. Folkloric vampires were either monsters that preyed on the living, genuine threats in the dark - some traditions had them being barely human, and closer to a slobbering beast, while others had them look human but be monsters - and the horror lay in the fact that someone you loved and was close to could suddenly turn into a monster and need to be killed; it was a betrayal, and an invasion of your safe home.
Folkloric beliefs in vampires was in some cases a way to deal with loss and the fear of death, and in some cases a way to explain the progress of a disease we didn't yet understand - like when an outbreak of tuberculosis triggered the New England vampire panic.
My main problem with Twilight (mind you, I've only watched the first two movies - which are great, if you view them as unintentional comedies) is the way it romanticises an abusive and frankly creepy relationship. I mean, Bella wakes up at one point in the middle of the night, to find and uninvited Edward standing in her bedroom watching her in her sleep. And we're told that she thinks that's cute and romantic instead of incredibly creepy and invasive. Bella literally hurts herself in an effort to be closer to Edward - and we're told to think that's romantic, instead of very worrying and a cause for alarm.
Bella, abandoned by Edward for "her own good", sits motionless in a chair for months, because she simply cannot function without him, and we're told that's romantic - instead of a clear sign of a very unhealthy relationship.
The fact that Twilight vampires sparkle isn't even the start of what's troubling about those books. I mean, I haven't even gotten to the bit where the werewolf dude basically falls in love with a newborn infant. :T
I always thought twilight was pretty innocuous, even at its worse. Vampires are sorta timeless and will be reinvented till oblivion. People are gonna humanize them or cast them in weird situations or whatever it's not a big deal as far as I am concerned. The Witchers take on vampires is pretty interesting (I've only read the novels, not played the games.) So that's modern right?
As far as the modern look is concerned eh.
eh is all I have to say.
No way, vampires are still very interesting. Can't say I actively seek them out but when I come across them I don't roll my eyes. Twilight and what it has/hasn't done for the vampires doesn't really come into it, it's about the creators all the different spins they put on them.
Here's a comic on this site containing vampires that I'm enjoying immensely : Sweet Talk1
And another I cannot stop reading: Thicker Than Blood2
I would love to see a werewolf with glow in the dark nails! It would be wonderful! Honestly people make to much of a big deal about vampires and werewolves. They don't always need to be serious stories. You can write them with humor. Honestly there should be more of a diversity in stories with vampires in it. It is kinda always the same thing I rarely read anything that has vampires and werewolves in it because it is kinda bland. Twilight doesn't matter much in the grand scheme of things.