I didn't kill the cringe. I embraced it.
C S Lewis once paraphrased a Biblical quote into this gem:
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
C S Lewis wasn't afraid to be a grown man who writes furry Jesus isekai fic... because he knew he was a grown up and had nothing to prove, and he had confidence that his stories about kids going to a magical land to hang out with lion Jesus were awesome, and he wrote them with absolute sincerity, and treated all the characters like he was writing any story with a less bizarre and fantastical premise.
A lot of under-baked writers see a series like say... Evangelion, and they go, "Ah. Evangelion is good because it has dark themes, like people being sad, and people getting killed, and robots beating up monsters, but in a cool way where it's violent. If you took that and removed all the silly elements like the kids and the robots being bright colours, and put in more sex and violence and people being sad, it'd be even better!"
....But thinking these surface elements; gloomy colours, lack of Fantasy, being about adults, sex and violence, people being sad and jaded, are the things that make something mature and worthy...is how a teenager, or somebody with the mind of a teenager thinks.
I rewatched Evangelion recently, and the thing that struck me, rewatching it as an adult, was the depth and nuance of the characters. It's a show about a 13 year old boy piloting a big purple robot and punching weird aliens... and yet it explores concepts like how we define ourselves from others, or what it means to have responsibility with absolute sincerity and sensitivity. These are the true things that make something good and deep. It's why Undertale is good; it's absolutely ridiculous in terms of concept and what the characters look and talk like... and yet, many people consider it a very deep and emotional experience, far more than grittier games with more violence and adult human characters and fewer silly jokes and puns, because Undertale genuinely explores feelings and has deep, nuanced characters.
It takes guts to step up and to say "THIS IS WHAT I LIKE." and to make something absurd, but then also not to weasel out of being laughed at by then saying "haha...ha, oh yeah, it's actually a parody. It's meant to be bad...on purpose..." and having all the characters quip, "Psh, this situation we're in is like a bad comic book lol." instead of expressing any kind of vulnerability. I used to do that, and I think it's actually way more cringe than my modern work, because it comes off so insecure. I'm not ashamed of who I am any more, and my work is stronger for it.
If somebody looks at my comic and says "PSH. This comic is stupid, it's about a bunch of melodramatic gay people in colour-coded outfits with silly unrealistic oversized weapons, it's for babies!" ...they're the fool who's only reading my work on the surface level. Any hack can make something that looks deep on the surface by having a gritty, dark art style and having everyone be miserable and putting in lots of sex, drugs and violence, but that's not real depth, it's just copying the surface elements of other things that are deep and choosing easy subjects to get a strong emotional reaction or seem mature by being adult-orientated. Real depth is about expressing something true and vulnerable that resonates with people. Hamlet isn't deep because everyone dies at the end, it's deep because it's an exploration of one man's emotional struggle with a politically, morally and emotionally complex situation. I have confidence in the depth of my work, and the seriousness with which I treat the things that truly matter; like the emotions of my characters, and the complexity of them having to work through a difficult situation where everyone has different feelings, and readers who are genuinely tuned into the story pick up on that, which makes it all feel worthwhile. 