I dont disagree with having violence, or even a component of sexuality. All I think is that violence for its own sake, or sexuality for its own sake... is entirely pointless.
If violence amounts to "violence is violence"
and sex "sex is sex"
Then it has no real purpose in the story. You often see the sexual compenent done extremely poorly in french comics, in french comics they basically feel obligated to have some sort of sexual component.
It happens, its boring, it has no bearing on the plot as a whole... and then it vanishes from the story like a rancid dustybunny that was just passing through.
Now what do you think is the greater sin? not portraying sex.. or portraying it so boringly and purposelessly that it loses all meaning and basically becomes a set piece? Whe nit is reduced ot basically the level of a walk cycle..
I will give you a single an example of how I handle Sexuality! Or at least the component of attraction, which is one of the most critically lacking aspects in comics (usually people just tend to draw the same woman over and over again, even for all the characters)
http://tapastic.com/episode/160057
In Rebel Cowgirls, each character is different... tehy have different hieght, different build, different outlook, attire, facial features... each character is supposed to he attractive in his or her own way.
Its not that sexuality has no place in fiction, its just that if you are convinced taht there is some sort of grand conspiracy against sex, or that it is somehow lacking in the fictional world, you are 100% going to fail at writing it.