Hi! Based on my experience, it really depends on how you want to present your story to the reader. I’ve experimented with different perspectives, but after some trial and error (which sometimes made the narrative confusing), I decided to stick with third-person limited POV because it works best for me.
This perspective allows me to control how much insight readers get into a character’s thoughts while still maintaining some mystery. It also helps with pacing and tension, which is especially useful in a complex story like mine.
I completely understand the struggle with narrative choices, but thanks to @Zhengo and @eldritchtroubadour’s advice and reviews, I was able to improve my storytelling. Looking back, I can see a clear difference in my writing compared to my early chapters, which I try to update from time to time.
In the end, it really depends on your story and what you want your readers to experience!
I like seeing everyone's perspectives here! Agreed that neither has objective or inherent superiority.
for me, the perspective I choose definitely depends on the story, and I think it can affect how the story develops as well! For FSDWSW, I switch between MC povs. It definitely has affected my storytelling; and I like having the opportunity to explore the effects of imperfect narration.
That said, there are a few aspects of the story and their relationships with other characters that my MCs will literally never know about, and I've ended up writing a few side stories as a result (probably to post as an interlude between arc 1 and arc 2). In the case of this novel, I think being limited in what I can tell the reader directly has helped me develop some as a writer (I have a long way to go). Not sure what narrative style I would choose for future projects, but Ive definitely learned things using this style that will affect how I write regardless!
This is something few other post tangentially mentioned, but
Don’t forget third person can be separated into third person limited and third person omniscient.
third person limited is when you write using the third person but everything is filtered through the perspective of a single character
third person omniscient is written from an all knowing perspective, you have access to all the characters thought and all the events
You can check this page for more info:
Both are a valid choice, and I do think some stories are more suited for first person, like mysteries/horror for example, while others you might make a more interesting story by writing in third person, for example if you have heavy worldbuilding and would like to show from various perspectives? Our novel is a roleplay adaptation, so we naturally wrote it in third person omniscient, but I found that adapting it into a novel was a bit tough. In my opinion, third person omniscient and (in our case) not having a protagonist but a cast of heroes is harder than limiting writing to a single perspective or one main focus, it's difficult to hop from one viewpoint to another without it being a bit weird sometimes.
I think that it depends on the kind of story you want to tell. Asking which is best may be a bit like asking, "which is better, a Phillips or a Slotted screwdriver?" First person takes advantage of the narrator's limited "field of view" & can create more mystery or misunderstanding. Third person permits the narrator to present everyone's limited field of view and the narrator can explain things that would be very difficult to insert in only a first person's narration.
Third person narratives can include personal & inner thoughts:
With an old screwdriver, he pried the hinges free of the layers of white paint and pushed them away from the door face. Then he forced the same screwdriver into a crack between the door and its frame. Come along quietly now if you know what's good for you. He began to pry. With a soft thump the door began to budge outward from its frame. "Damn. Quieter, you fool", he whispered to himself.
I usually use a third-person narrative for stories with lots of characters, side stories, and multiple subplots excluding the main characters (like villains to scheme behind the MC's back). This gives me more control in deciding which part should remain a mystery, create the right cliffhanger, and maintain tension.
For example, Anne is working at a cafe, and someone steals from the cash register and blames her. Once she finds the real culprit, the narration will switch to the culprit. That will show readers how the culprit planned it, if anyone helped her, and her motivation.
With a first-person narrative, it's almost impossible to gauge another character's motivation to do something because, essentially, everything is from the MC's perspective and based on her judgment/assumptions.
I use the first-person narrative for emotionally charged stories. This allows me to convey the MC's feelings in real time to readers. At the same time, this type of narration is also good for building mystery. It allows the MC to mislead readers because memories can be distorted depending on feelings, and everything is up to the MC's interpretations of things.
I would say a first-person narrative is good for drama and suspense/thriller genres. Romantic genre works, too, since it focuses on feelings and emotions. But fantasy romance or royal court drama or high-conflict stories would work better with a third-person narrative, as it gives insights into a lot of things that happen in parallel.
why don't you try both perspective... depending on the situation...... I mean like you start the story with perspective of a single character, but when you need you can switch to a monologue to use 3rd person perspective and then switch to another character first person perspective. I mean, now that i've mentioned it, i want to try it
here is a link to my story you can check it out
Third person should be your default, unless you have some reason for changing it up. If you're going to do a first person inner monologue, that inner monologue should be entertaining somehow by itself. Maybe it's a noir, maybe the protagonist is unreliable or nuts, maybe they have an absurd comment to make about everything they see, or perhaps you want to really hone in on the innocence of the POV character amid terrible things or have a conversation with the reader directly.
But if you don't think your lead is quite so splashy, those other perspectives will do better I think. It does simplify those moments when you need to tell rather than show a scenario or elide a time gap.