40 / 40
Dec 2022

Oh Im not the only one weirded out when people do this. like a post that's like

Unintelligible screeching into the void
"Also here's my art :heart_eyes:"


Like I get frustation but I also get the back lash, when it low key suggests popular artists are only popular cus they ""went the easy mode" NSFW art, fan art, joke art still struggle in on social media in genral especially what is promoted is less art and more... things :sweat_smile:.

Honestly Ive heard many keep saying "lets make our own social media but for artists :triumph:" song and dance. But.. time and time again those sites tend to flop due to being overunned with only artists, very few causal viewers and customers. Hence big artists who want to make a living leave to twitter and instagram cus the new site can't support them, making a feed back loop of a dead site.

its a sad fact

They might be different people with different opinions, but also people are naturally irrational and contradictory

Damn it, people saying they know which comic this was is making me curious but I feel like I shouldn't ask :'D (EDIT: oh screw it, someone plz PM it to me, the curiosity's killing me, I won't go flaming on it or anything I swear XDthanke :D)

True; I guess it's just that thinking of it as 'different people with different opinions' makes me less salty XD People are naturally irrational, but I feel like a person discussing stuff in good faith would acknowledge their contradictions when pointed out to them and concede they were probably wrong about one of their opinions if they can't logically reconcile it with the other.

It makes me really salty when people want to have their cake and eat it too, and straight up gaslight you into thinking their logically inconsistent opinions are perfectly consistent so they can hold onto both :persevere:

okay so repliying to new replies (just plz ignore my typos im on phone)

some new responses to the op on twitter have definitely given some suprising answers and made me feel a lil better in terms of having some level of empathy for the guy

again yes the phrasing was not the best but the frustrations he expressed are the same natural emotion that literally so many artists experience but maybe express in quieter ways (go figure)

in terms of twitter as an environment for artists in general a lot of folks know that its (pardon my language) shit and since the most recent change in leadership is probably bound to get a hell of a lot worse unfortunately but the thing is artists kind of have to put themselves in places where viewers arent also predominantly artits but art enjoyers because yeah artists often (or at least in some cases) are willing to support each other but we also kind of have to market ourselves to consumer demographics hence going to these platforms like twitter, ig or tiktok. theres lots to say about how by design the algorithms will always be draining and ass kicking but thats a whole other beast to tackle. the main tie in is just its one among a handul of things that create this hard to flourish in environment unless you get lucky

with regards to the "this blew up check out my ___" i dont even know when or how that started but ive noticed its usually this like attitude of "well if ppl are gonna give whatever take of my all this attention may as well put it to use". it's not always fitting imo but humans will human

specifically in regards to norie's reply about different people with different opinions that's absolutely what was happening on the Twitter timeline where i was seeing a lot of just vitriol and bitterness at first from like very random folks but some time later i got to see like more rational takes from the folks i actually follow

but going back to like decent platforms the "for artists by artists" formula doesn't really work cuz again it doesn't have a proper balance of artists and art enjoyers but the only platforms that seem like they'd stand a chance are artfol and inkblot coz sheezy died and buzzly was/ a dumpster fire. at this point i doubt we can really go back to the "good ol days" so theres really no choice but to adjust and adapt as best is possible which sure it sucks but for sake of surviving theres not really any other choice. like i saw so many folks lamenting over old DeviantArt but thats definitely not really coming back so all that can be done is like in thay one meme about "adapt and overcome"

as for folks clinging on to bad faith takes i think im just kinda over it coz people will say the absolute worst things and then try to blanket over it with something mildly decent but my primary response to stuff nowadays that reeks even ablittle is to just mute or block and move on coz i do not have the energy for a lot of the online back n forth

again tho appreciate folks for hopping into the discussion :v:

Oh god yes. It is by far and away THE MOST toxic of all of the social media platforms because the format encourages stripping context and other reductionist exercises. There was that great meme on twitter that keeps getting re-posted where it's something like

Twitter user 1: I love waffles! :heart_eyes:
Twitter user 2: OMG HOW DARE YOU HATE PANCAKES

And... it's pretty accurate to twitter discourse, honestly.

Also I finally saw the comic in question today and not gonna lie, these are some thin skin mofos if they actually felt insulted by it (in fact, I'm pretty sure a similar comic was done years ago by a popular gag-a-day webcomic and the response was generally positive). Like, it is just the truth that trendy art (including NSFW or fanart) just gets more engagement. And it's the truth that artists who do not draw those things always work from a disadvantage. And it's ALSO the truth that any kind of success in life is pretty much predicated by luck. I know people wanna hear like it's totally not random and it's totally all their hard work and effort, but it ain't. Two people can work equally as hard, and one will get lucky and succeed and the other won't have the same luck and won't see the same success.

Like... here's a good example. I draw some fanart of some celebrities. I tweet it. I JUST HAPPEN to post at the PERFECT time for that artwork to show up at the top of that celebrity's feed (which is dominated by thousands of mentions and likes and whatever). He likes it and retweets it; suddenly, I have several hundred new followers. I post it a minute earlier or later, and none of that happens.

Now, there ARE choices I can make in this context, I'm not completely helpless when it comes to finding this luck. The first choice is drawing the fanart at all - if I didn't, my chances of success (i.e. having this celebrity amplify my art) are pretty much zero, but if I do, the odds go up. That's under my control. The second is if I keep drawing fanart and keep posting it, every piece is a small chance at success, which means I'm creating more opportunities for getting lucky. (There's also a third one where you e-stalk the celebrity and chart their most common times online and attempt to optimize your posting times but uh... that's a lil'... creepy) Conversely, if I choose to NOT engage in this behaviour, then I am actively choosing to avoid potential avenues for success, and the consequences of that choice are my responsibility.

But there ain't nothing wrong with pointing out the luck aspect. =/

My view is that social media will be looked back upon as being the cultural equivalent of asbestos: Delivered what was promised, but it still gave our society cancer.

Regarding social media, fan art and luck, I think it's important to be aware that getting "lucky" and going outrageously viral with a post, especially a piece of fan art, doesn't mean you're all set. It's not completely useless, but it's maybe not as effective a means of promotion as people think.

Because on the internet, when marketing, you need to always keep in mind this one concept: every extra click loses people.

Only a fraction of the people who see the piece on their timeline will drop a like, comment or share.
Then only a fraction of them will go to your profile to see that you have other work.
Then only a fraction of them will be interested enough to look at your original work (how many depends somewhat on how similar in style, tone, themes and audience demographics your work is to the thing you posted fanart of).
Then only a fraction of those will follow links off the platform they're on to look at a comic.
And then only a fraction of those few who got this far and looked at your comic will subscribe and become readers.

It's compounded nowadays with the way social media is constructed to make leaving the site a pain. Twitter's algorithm doesn't like links, for example. Social media platforms don't want you to go and look at somebody's webcomic on Tapas; they want you to stay on their platform and engage with more posts there. This means they're a lot less effective than they used to be for promotion than they were back in the day.

I'm friends with a lot of professional artists, and a general feeling is that fan art can boost engagement and your social media following, but you need to go in knowing that most people who engage with your fan content won't then engage with your original content. It's not a good way to advertise your own stuff, but if you pick the right fandoms, you might be able to attract the attention of people who like similar things and then you can market your original content to them while you have their attention, and whether that succeeds will depend on how suited your content is to that audience and how well you market it, just as if you were advertising anywhere else.
In many cases, you may find that it's just as effective, if not more, to post some panels from your comic that highlight how funny or dramatic your comic is and to tag it into every webcomics-related or other appropriate tag, as it is to draw a really great piece of Owl House fanart that gets a thousand likes and then to hope some of them look at your other stuff. In either case, whether people engage with your original content depends heavily on how accessible, appealing and engaging your original content is. At least the people browsing webcomic tags are likely to actually be looking for webcomics to read and will be open to giving original content a shot; the people browsing Owl House tags probably aren't, so even if the engagement with that post is high, the trickle-down into new readers on your original comic might be very small.

So that's why I don't really encourage people to focus too heavily on the "luck" element of things, because it's simply not the case that one big viral hit will have you set (or even several if you're me... I once went so viral I got interviewed by Kotaku. There are multiple blog entries about pieces of viral content I've done because one is used as a teaching aid now). Once you have people's attention, the thing you show them while they're looking at you needs to be accessible, appealing and entertaining just as much as if you use or are gifted any other means to get people looking at your work (ie. paying for ads, getting a Tapas feature, having a famous person give you a shout-out). Having a massive number of people looking may offset your poor "conversion rate" (an advertising term: Conversion is how many people who see an ad click to go to the site, or how many people who get to the site subscribe or buy something), but only somewhat. So you should always be focusing on how to make your work as inviting and engaging to the people who do see it as possible, before you focus on trying to make lots of people see it.

You can't necessarily control when your visibility gets boosted by a feature or a recommendation or something, or how well suited to your original work the people who see you are, so yeah, that part is luck... but you can control how you capitalise on that luck by making sure that what people see of your original work when it's visible looks attractive and compelling, and that's nearly entirely not luck (the only luck element is if you happen to work in a fashionable style and genre without having deliberately planned it), it's largely stuff you can choose and learn through research, study, attention to detail and good creative choices. If your work isn't grabbing people's interest when people see it on the forums or discord or webcomics communities, people seeing your work because you drew fan art isn't going to fix that problem.

yes, this 1000%. It always blows my mind when people who are still learning to draw, and maybe are still struggling with human proportions and rendering their work (which is fine! We all start somewhere) then say "Oh, I'll just draw fanart porn to get lots of subs" and it's like...how exactly are you going to be able to do that? Like you don't have all the tools in the toolbox yet and also those fandoms are VERY saturated.

And it's more than just "get gud" when it comes to making something appealing, there's a whole way of adding narrative to your images that will draw people into the works you post. Which, is a very frustrating skill to learn, but absolutely required to draw online. (and like honestly the source of a lot of my frustration with posting stuff online where my studies that are more technically challenging don't get views while my simpler art that has narrative will.)

Although I will say, usually fanart has a narrative to it, which can help you learn how to make appealing original works. Like a lot of people drew paintings of realistic huge pokemon a while back, and that had a lot of narrative to it. Yes it was pokemon, but even if the pieces weren't a pokemon, but a giant original monster, it would have still gotten notice because the moody atmostphere and the scale of the monsters to the people was so impressive. It could stand alone, and had so many likes and reblogs, certainly some of the people liking it had no idea it was a pokemon art at all.

So I think taking from popular tags like fandoms and asking "why is this image really popular, even if the fandom didn't exist" can really help in identifying ways to create engaging works that pop on a timeline saturated in competing art, that make people stop scrolling and go "oh! I like that!" (which is really hard to do, I have been doing this like a decade, and I am still learning all the time on how to do this sort of thing)

chiming in one last time to say thanks for the replies and while i've only got the spoons to skim these last few i appreciate the insight especially since it's something i've observed myself in my years on the internet and i'm sure other folks can absolutely take something from it but that aside i'll be peacin' out on this topic since i got what i was looking for :v:

I wasn't going to post since everyone has already said what I was going to say, but to the folks who (I assume.) are talking negatively about that one 4 panel comic that smalltime creator made on Twitter. I'm going to be a mean bitch, I'm sorry.

  1. They didn't say anything bad about NSFW creators, all they did was have a panel showing that, along with fanart, trends and what not, getting more attention. Which as someone who has drawn porn and fanart in the past, yeah, while I still had to promote it does get more attention. People are horny, and are more attached to pre-existing mainstream characters they already know than OCs, which there is nothing wrong with. That doesn't mean creators who make these kinds of works put less time and effort into their art, they put in a ton of effort, and the creator of that comic didn't remotely insinuate that wasn't the case.

  2. While I agree you shouldn't be obsessed numbers, but from what I saw there was no previous evidence indicating they're doing that. For all we know they could have just had a bad day, with the lack of engagement being the last straw, and needed to vent. As human beings, experiencing the occasional bouts of jealousy and bitterness are normal, healthy emotions. Which are perfectly fine to vent about if you're not trying to harm anyone, and their vent art was completely harmless. (Again, occasional. Yes, it's unhealthy to let these emotions take control of your life, but there's nothing wrong with feeling them every so often.) If you tell me you never feel jealous of someone from time to time, you're lying or some kind of unicorn of a person.

It really rubs me the wrong way that so many people have gotten on this person for creating generic, victimless vent art. It comes off as people intentionally being malicious under the guise of being "well meaning" or "crusading for NSFW creators", because this was such a non-issue thing that blew up for no good reason. At least it's not a good enough reason to harass the shit out of them. I feel extremely bad for this person, who knows what kind of terrible stuff people said to them in DMs, or on their main comic.
Yeah, there are things they can improve on with their work, and how they promote, but it's not okay to treat someone badly for venting emotions. It's also not okay to twisting what they say into something worse than it is for "justice points".

Also sure, no one is owed readers/viewers, but you can complain about not being seen while not thinking you're owed anything. Sometimes it just feels good to get that gunk out of your system. I've done it plenty of times in my life, and I know very good well that I'm not owed anyone's time and attention. I'm only a human being doing human stuff, just like that comic creator who got dogpiled into needing a break from the internet.

Agreed, I hate Twitter.

Again, sorry! This particular thing just rubbed me the wrong way, I admit to being more salty than I should be.

I think part of the issue here is the context where one vents.

I know that venting can be a coping mechanism for many, of course, this is healthier to do when one is venting with a person they trust that can listen, give comfort and/or advice.

Sadly, engaging at such personal levels with random strangers, more often than not, is a terrible idea.
Be it because they misinterpret your intention behind the venting, they see it as unprofessional or just plain trolling.

So, are these artists contradicting themselves?......oddy enough, not neccesarily.
On social media, a certain level of professionalism is expected, so we are judged by our attitude. And sadly, venting is seen as unprofessional. Maybe some folks may consider this unfair, but that's how folks are judged.

So my take in this is: we have to choose wisely where to vent and where to ask for advice.
I see venting as something more personal, so i would direct it to a more personal context, and about asking for advice.....is better to make sure folks there know what they are talking about.

okay so i'm a filthy liar (hyperbole) but @urmom hit the nail on the head in terms of what i /was feeling but didn't know how to express

Second:

I absolutely get this and agree but only to a certain extent because something I feel is that 9/10 this is often if not always reduced to "just produce content and shut up about everything else" and it's really trash imo especially in certain contexts

Like yeah maybe twitter dot com isn't the best place to express certain emotions unless it's like a private account with pals or a group chat but there's a fine line i think when it comes to other things

But the thing is, vent art/writing being publicized has been a thing since the dawn of it's creation. Some are worse takes than others, yes, but it's not some thing that doesn't and shouldn't happen. Hell, that's part of what makes art what it is. For many people art is an expression of emotion, which venting is expressing an emotion. I don't see the idea of it being "unprofessional" as unfair, it's just dumb and short sighted.

I can agree there is a time and place for things, but this person vented on their own Twitter page, there is no better place to share their thoughts and feelings than there. If that is so unprofessional that it needs to be dealt with by thousands of people, why aren't artist who make vent work regularly or for a living getting that caliber of shit? Why haven't I been harassed off social media yet for my vent comic? It's far worse, and more inappropriately personal, than the person who made this 4 panel comic about not being seen.

Not to mention, what about the people who don't want to be professionals? Do they have to fall in line with the professionals because they might get harassed for expressing their thoughts/feelings through their art? I get what you're saying, but the "vent art should be private or shared in limited spaces" argument totally ignores the centuries of artists who've published, publicly posted and have gotten their vent art hung in galleries. Not to mention performative and protest art, which can be very venty.

Never said venting shouldn't happen, just that in some contexts it will not be well received.

Ooof, twitter is a dumpster fire. I am not victim-blaming, but venting there is a terrible idea because opening one's heart to toxic people is a terrible idea in general.

i feel bad that op went trough that.

My post worked more as a blunt explanation on why this may happen, but of course nothing justifies such shitty behavior towards Op.

Nothing justifies harassment.....but again, twitter is the worst place to seek for any form of emotional support.

And hey, people doing art as a hobby don't need to adhere to the rules of professionalism, but for any hobbyist....please, for your own emotional wellbeing...... don't open your heart on twitter...... it's full of assholes.

Readers here may already notice that i despise what twitter has become along the years :sweat_smile:

... Alright, you got me. Twitter is a shithole... and yeah, people there do make it a bloodsport to turn someone's humanity against them.

Sorry for blowing up, I'm not mad at you, I'm just mad. If I didn't have to use the internet to connect with stuff, or do my job, I would dump it in a heartbeat. The anonymity turns you into the worst kind of person.

no problem, :grin: as long as we all can talk things out like civilized folks we are in a better place than most of the internet.

this reminds me of an old saying by Oscar Wilde if i'm not mistaken:

"give someone a mask and they will show their true self"

Tbh I'm grateful to people who vent in publicly accessible spaces; if I relate, it's a relief that someone said the thing I always wanted to say but was too afraid to and it makes me feel less like a bad person because hey, this other person felt the same and I wouldn't call them a bad person, would I?

And if I don't relate, maybe sometimes I'll vent about their vent and start a dialogue, but I try my darndest to represent their feelings faithfully, not put words in their mouth and not accuse them of ill intent/bad faith/'entitlement' because even if their vent was actually harmful in some way, talking about intentions would only make them feel more defensive and not any more likely to change :sweat_02:

So yeah, I would personally prefer it if people continued to vent in public :stuck_out_tongue: But yeah, unfortunately with the reality of how people have always been and still are to this day*, you should really steel yourself and be prepared for backlash if you choose to do so :sweat_02:


*

I honestly don't think it's a 'people these days' or 'social media/internet/anonymity' thing either. Lots of people care about the identities they're building for themselves online. In this case, I think it's more of a 'witch hunt' kind of mentality; when being against the person being dogpiled/rallied against is a decently socially acceptable opinion, people are emboldened to do it even without the veil of anonymity.

The kind of toxicity that anonymity actually encourages is a totally different kind when people express blatantly controversial opinions. They often use 'throwaways' instead of their 'main' and almost no-one rallies to support them. And I personally think this kind of anonymity has a positive side too, when the 'blatantly controversial' opinion might actually be correct but is only considered 'blatantly controversial' because of prejudice and oppression - anonymity allows such opinions to be expressed too :]

1 month later

closed Dec 7, '22

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.