Speaking from a publishing perspective, romance in novels is a cottage core industry. Throw in any buzzword you want about women supporting women and there will be gatekeeping. Women make careers out of writing smutty romances which include all the toxic tropes we hate. You insult their income stream, gatekeeper will happen.
With the examples you referenced, I think I has less to do with the idea of "romance" and more to do with the effects of p*rn and how culturally accepted violence against women is. A Handmaid's Tale was written as a warning dystopia but the show, from the ads, seems to highlight more a world where abused women are fighting to reclaim the power. GoT feeds into the idea a lot of male writers have about fantasies being "historically accurate" so it's okay to assault women.
With standard romance novels, the readers don't care. As long as the books provide them a "safe" place to experience the traumas in the book. They don't care if she was beaten, gaslighted, SA'd or nearly assaulted - as long she's "happy" by the end of the book and her primary love interest "loves" her, the audience is willing to forgive all sorts of crimes. You try to fight the diehard fans, they'll gatekeep.