Hm, I see we've started getting the fun responses... ^^;;;;
So...because this MC doesn't have any close friends, she has essentially lost what makes her human? Is that what you're trying to tell me? Do...you think this is an okay thing to say...???
I feel like you're coming from a sympathetic place, but your judgement of this potential story and character seems to be weighed down heavily by societal limitations on who a person without friends can be and how their story can be told.
For instance:
By 'loner archetype', do you mean that thing where the MC of a story is like a mean anime boy who 'doesn't need friends' and pushes away all the characters who try to get close to him...? Because that's what I understand of it...but that's not the only way someone who doesn't happen to have friends can behave. ^^; Like, you claim that you don't have any friends; would you consider yourself to be part of the 'loner archetype'? Why do you assume that that's what's going on here...?
Also-- just because she doesn't have friends, doesn't mean she doesn't interact with anyone. Like many people have suggested, there can definitely be 'friendly' people in her life, people she likes and is familiar with, even if they aren't close.
Her two partners in the story have such roles...I suppose the 'normal' thing to do, as a writer, would be to make them of a similar age so that they'd be likely to become friends over the course of the story. But, because I decided to make them an older teen boy and a middle-aged mother of 3...they once again kind of fall more into 'friendly' territory. ^^; Their relationship during the story will have depth and importance, but I can't see it being the kind that would extend very far beyond the work they do together, at least not at this point in MC's young life.
I see what you mean by that, but one of my philosophies as a writer is: why not?? :T If there is a real, lived human experience out there that no one has tried to include in a story, why not give it a try? Why not treat it as something that matters enough to convey to others??
This is kind of the driving force behind the idea of representation: for as long as writing has existed as a profession, writers have been told that audiences just don't want to see certain characters, that certain lifestyles just can't be entertaining or interesting. But if we listen to these voices, we'll never expand the selection of stories that future readers will get to see and relate to.
If you have ever enjoyed a story starring a character who is female, neurodivergent, LGBTQ+, disabled, older than usual, younger than usual-- thank someone who didn't listen to people who told them that their particular slice of the 'real world' didn't have any place in the 'fictional world'.
...To be honest, no. It's just the way she is. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I have this urge to be incredibly contrarian and go "I wonder, would you be asking 'why' if I'd said 'how do you write an MC with a lot of friends'"?? But (a) I already know the answer, and (b) it's a little beside the point.
When I build characters, I often decide on traits I want based on gut instinct/dice rolls, and then the process of fleshing them out consists of finding ways to make those traits fit together. Sometimes it's frustrating and I get lost and confused...like in the OP. ^^; But it always ends up being worth the effort, and it feels more natural than tailoring a character's lifestyle to fit a certain pre-planned message or direction. I think I get more 3-dimensional characters this way.
...there is so much to unpack in this little half-sentence, I don't even know where to begin
Um, well...I guess it's technically true that there usually isn't 'no reason'; there's always a reason for why a life ends up a certain way. In my case, for instance, I think the main reasons I've never had many friends are:
(a) Aggressive neurodivergence
(b) Having never really met anyone I particularly wanted to be friends with
(c) Finding relationship maintenance incredibly draining...probably due to (b). Maybe it wouldn't be draining to keep tabs on someone I really 'clicked' with, but so far I haven't had an opportunity to find out whether that's true, so...
So yeah. There are "reasons"...but they're not really under anyone's control, and they don't mean anything in a way that could make them plot points to reckon with. That's just how the cookie crumbled. =/
Which is what makes me suspicious of the question. ^^; It feels like you expect me to rationalize her 'friendlessness' in some way, despite the fact that in many cases (like my own) there's really nothing to rationalize.
*And by the way, when I said she was normal, I meant...basically, a non-artist. ^^ I've been around long enough to know that life as a creative person is just * different *, and I was hoping to get some ideas of other things that could shape her thoughts and interests, since I can't just use my own art-obsessed life as a blueprint. Just FYI~
Okay, I feel like this just needs to be said: people can still have fears, desires, and motivations-- basically, they can still have rich inner lives that exist outside of their relationships. The fact that I've never really had any close friends doesn't make me an aimless, pointless, passionless blob with no character potential, which is why these remarks (as a response to my question) feel a little...ignorant and low-key offensive. =/
And maybe it's just me, but when I write characters, I use more than just the other people in their adventures to develop them. I incorporate their own lived experiences, their outlooks on life, their morals, their personal likes and dislikes.
Sure, the direct influence of other people can affect these things, but they don't absolutely have to. And at the end of the day, no matter how much influence in your life comes from other people, you still make your own decisions. You decide what's most important to you, and why it matters.
Basically, agency and self-determination are also things that characters happen to be built of. I...really never thought I would have to argue this. ._.