So, it feels more like you treat them like a puppeteer or maybe like pawns on a chessboard, doing whatever you will them at your own behest, right? Like an omniscient overlord (which, I guess we technically are), you put them in the places you feel work best regarding specific situations. It feels like you're playing chess and analyzing how one pawn would match together with other pieces to make for a good and thrilling game. I like it!
Hah, so should I start calling you an asari? It's like you're mind-melding with your characters. Or, I guess it's just the ordinary, "were I in their shoes, what would I do?" It makes sense -- absolutely nothing wrong with that.
So, your method is like reading a play aloud to see how it would sound when done at x time in y situation?
Fiction is usually based off of reality in some format -- if you think of it like talking to a friend you're close to, is it really so off base?
There's nothing crazy about your methodology. Some things just have to be heard to be really focused on. Well done on finding something that works best for you.
I tend to have movie scenarios enacted in my mind as well, but then I typically want to physically encapsulate everything that goes on, and that's just asking for some injuries.
When you go about creating your comics, do you do dialogue first or imagine the scenario first and fit in the dialogue to match?