So this is an interesting phenomenon I've been hearing about in fiction...although I think it's more of a cultural zeitgeist thing; reflecting what society thinks 'romantic love' means and how it should be expressed and portrayed.
Basically, the introduction of romance to a character dynamic can often be a net negative for the overall enjoyment of the characters involved. :T
Emphasis on the word "can" here--> I don't think this is what usually happens, at least not in every media genre. But the underlying assumption is there, to the point where some fans are flat-out opposed to romantic developments in the stories they follow because of it. They expect that when characters fall in love, they will become less interesting people, or in some cases worse people who start neglecting/rejecting their platonic connections in favor of their 'more important' romantic ones.
My opinion on this used to be basically 'that's rough buddy'-- I didn't deny that it was a real problem that had probably ruined quite a few characters, but it wasn't something I'd ever experienced firsthand. I figured it was just an issue of sloppy writing that I'd probably see coming a mile away, if it ever affected anything I watched/read.
Until this morning, when I was peacefully reading manga and suddenly got blindsided by the most pointless character assassination I've ever seen in fiction. o_O
I won't get into specifics, but here's the basic rundown: Character A and B have been built up as quasi-romantic love interests for a long time, with B clearly infatuated with A. They have a heartwarming friendship and a close mutual connection to each other.
Enter Character C, who's clearly romantically interested in B. B is too focused on A to seriously consider returning their feelings (and C realizes this), but they still have a bit of a connection and eventually develop a casual friendship. Not as deep as what A and B have, but they're comfortable together.
Eventually, C seeks out A, their rival for B's affection...and they also seem to get along fine. C hides their friendship with B from A (who's oblivious to all of this), wanting to simply meet them and learn who they are as neutral strangers. And they're noticeably cold to them, but not overtly rude or anything. They have a pleasant conversation before peacefully parting ways, with C seemingly looking forward to learning more about A in the future.
And then later on, A, B, and C finally meet, all together in the same room...and C suddenly turns into an abrasive, insensitive, hypercritical b*tch, spending a whole chapter invading B's personal space while insulting A and trying to put them down at every opportunity, before finally becoming embarrassed with themselves and pulling the 'just joking' card at the last second.
It was...painful to read. =( Particularly because it wasn't even written badly, for the most part...both A and B remained in-character and spoke normally. And one of C's insults led to an insightful observation from A, that really made me think about an aspect of the worldbuilding that the story usually didn't touch on. Such a shame that it was prompted by a normally cool, enjoyable character suddenly becoming a bully for no reason.
...I mean, not NO reason. Clearly, the reason was 'romance'...it felt obnoxiously obvious that the reason this was happening was to shamelessly milk the 'love triangle' aspect of the character dynamic at play. Enough to damage my enjoyment of the character and the story, and my trust in the writing itself.
Following up a blatant character assassination with a moment of regret doesn't make it okay...the same way an apology doesn't automatically make a transgression forgiven. As the writer, you still have to show some proof that you know what happened was wrong and that you have a reason for forcing the audience to sit through it...and now, as the reader, instead of simply enjoying these cute romantic threads crossing over each other, now I'm stuck waiting for that proof. And to be perfectly honest, I'm not 100% confident that I'm going to get it...like I said, that trust has already been broken.
All that is to say, I understand now. ^^;;; So I just wanna know why.
Why do so many writers feel the need to portray romance in this way-- not as something that enhances relationships and lends them depth, but as something that strains relationships (particularly those that aren't directly involved...) and honestly flattens them, turning nuanced attitudes towards other people into a jealous dichotomy between aggression and tolerance. And in the worst cases, turning one's attitude towards the object of one's affection into a one-note possessive protectiveness.
It honestly makes me feel unsettled whenever I try to write a romance; I always feel like I'm venturing into uncharted territory by actually trying to dive deep into how the partners make each other's lives better. What they learn from each other and need from each other; how they gradually communicate the depth of their feelings.
Conversely, I tend to portray romantic jealousy as something debilitating and painful, something that someone suffers, not a weapon they get to fling at everyone else in the cast. It may cause problems and conflict, yes, but at the end of the day it's something they WANT to work through and heal from.
It's not 'proof of their devotion', it's a bad feeling that they just want to be rid of so they can live in peace. And they do this by finding the courage to reach out to their romantic rivals and develop alongside them, not by "eliminating" them or proving that they're somehow the only one who "truly" loves the one they love.
And it's like...why is ^this the UNcommon strategy...? What is the inherent appeal of romantic attraction being the highway to hell...? There must be one; all those "I hate my wife" jokes can't have come from nowhere. ^^;
Like, is it just drama? Just tradition; an established structure or set of tropes that writers tend to follow? Or is there something more...?
created
Sep '24
last reply
Sep '24
- 28
replies
- 816
views
- 1
user
- 49
likes