4 / 24
Sep 2023

Last time I started a topic like this, some of the replies were...honestly disgusting, so before I start I'd just like to give a word of advice-- if you're going to disagree with anything I say (and you have every right to), maybe try not to make dismissive remarks while you're doing it??
If you sit down to type a reply and find yourself about to say that you don't think my experiences are valid, you don't think people like me actually exist, or that you think the concerns I'm expressing/ideas I'm proposing go against "what makes people human"...maybe first, stop and think about why the existence of someone with a different outlook on social life is so unacceptable to you (because it really shouldn't be...). And above all, consider that the person you're replying to...is also a human. =/

Anyway...this isn't actually gonna be a super-long rant, despite the weighty preface. ^^; After all, I haven't actually written a story about this type of social outcast before...except once. And even then, that character was still a child-- i.e. a couple years too young to truly understand the implications of 'not fitting in', and too impulsive to let his social anxieties actually stop him from doing things. Rather than keeping to himself out of fear of having an awkward interaction, he would just continually jump into interactions with anyone he was interested in, and then when they turned out awkward, he'd beat himself up for his thoughtless decisions later on. ^^; Which is another common struggle with socializing, but not the one I'm talking about today.

What I'm thinking of is a pretty commonplace YA narrative, where we start out with an MC who is shy, isolated, and very lonely; and for any number of reasons-- neurodivergence, trauma, psychological/medical disorders, bullying, having a different cultural background, or just for having different interests from most people their age. Or all of the above. ^^;
But then, over the course of the story, due to some fantastical plot or a dire situation, or even just happenstance, they finally form a connection with someone. And while this relationship gradually grows and develops, they gain self-confidence and become more willing to share themselves with the world, and before you know it, they have 'come out of their shell', and generally end the story with a group of new friends, a 'found family', and/or a love interest to support them.

I can appreciate these stories, and I get what they mean: the point is to show that just one special human connection can change the course of your entire life. And that even if you feel alone and hopeless now, it won't always be that way. Someday you'll meet the right person, and things will change. There's a good friend for you out there somewhere, and you just need to wait until they come around.

I don't think this message is bad, or untrue, or unnecessary...but personally, I've never really liked it. :T And it's only recently that I've become able to articulate why.

It's really just the same thing I've always felt-- that encouraging people to wait for someone else to validate them and make them feel worthy of existing can easily just set people up for problems. Because...there's actually no guarantee that this will happen when you're at that 'magical age' in high school or college. ^^ I mean, what happens when you're still lonely and friendless at age 25? Age 35?? Age 65?? How do you cope while you "wait"? How long can a person go on "waiting" before they become bitter and clinically depressed, or worse...? What if you spend your whole life waiting for nothing...??

I think it's the 'waiting' aspect that gets me, because it implies that if you're not socially adept, or even just a member of a friend group of any kind (even if they're fellow weirdos), then it just hasn't happened "yet". That it's definitely going to happen eventually, just not now. And I think the fact that, again, there's actually no guarantee, should probably be addressed by someone, somewhere, at some point...

Because in my experience, I feel it's given me this weird expectation whenever I enter into a new group of people, especially now that I'm an adult, switching jobs and being introduced to different communities more often. I'm always looking at each new person wondering if they are going to be that 'special connection' that changes my entire life, my first experience of """real""" friendship. After all, that's how it works in stories, right??

But in reality...that's never even come close to happening for me. ^^; I like most of the people I work with, and I've even formed casual workplace friendships with a few of them, but that's about it. Since I left school, I've never even exchanged phone numbers with anyone for non-work-related reasons.

And honestly? I don't mind. :T I think it's fine to just have nice interactions with people, even if they aren't deep and enduring, and tend to end as soon as you leave the environment. My social needs are more or less fulfilled from that alone.
Which makes that aforementioned weird expectation feel...unhealthy. Like something I need to stop doing, so I can truly be satisfied with my life the way it is. Like "if you don't need more, why are you still waiting for more??"

And I think it's because I've just never heard anything else. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ Not from fiction, obviously, but not even from other people (especially after that previous incident on this forum...). There's just no such thing as a solitary person; even internet friendships are eventually supposed to blossom into life-changing encounters. The idea that it might just...not happen, is unheard of, to the point of appearing nonsensical.

I don't actually believe ^that, though. ^^; I think it's much more likely that people who are solitary or even desperately lonely just don't talk about it. It's not like it's a cheery subject...people don't seem to want to hear about it, even when you're using a fictional character as a proxy. The only instance in which they want to see this issue come up is in one where it's solved, preferably quickly.

But, yet again...that's not actually a guarantee.

And it just makes me think...if, someday, I can overcome my experience-based aversion to socially anxious, lonely outcast characters...I'd like to try and write a story with a different ending. Even if it's short. Just something that says, y'know, even if you don't end up with that magical friendship that changes everything...you're gonna be okay. Even a casual relationship is still a human connection-- if it becomes something more, great. But if it doesn't, that's fine too. It doesn't mean you did something wrong or that you're less worthy; it just is what it is.

And most importantly, you don't have to be miserable until someone finally arrives to rescue you; even if no one ever does, things CAN get better. Even if you still want to wait-- in the meantime, it's not impossible to make a difference in your own life.

  • created

    Sep '23
  • last reply

    Sep '23
  • 23

    replies

  • 2.1k

    views

  • 1

    user

  • 70

    likes

One i just wanna say it's nice to see another thread from you and I definitely felt that discomfort from the replies of the last thread on this subject. I also wholeheartedly agree with a lot of what you've said here and the timing is kinda crazy since it's something I've been quietly mulling over while I look at my own "social life" and how I handle interpersonal connections.

I've definitely had a similar frustration with this idea of "if you just wait someone will come save you from your solitude" or however media, and even other people, tend to frame that. It truly gets tiring to hear over and over especially when you struggle to click with the folks you meet or it ends up where there's some areas where you and another person can hit it off but it totally falls apart when it comes to other aspects of each individual (something I feel like I've been dealing with a lot as I've tried going back to old spaces where I've tried to interact with others)

I would LOVE to see a story where there's a character who exists in solitude but is able to make peace with being okay on their own, still having those short periods of interaction with work or small outings but still being cozy going back to their own quiet space.

Like I always assume it's a consequence of this weird extrovert majority or that being portrayed as the ideal, so anything that strays from this perceived norm is somehow weird and wrong when that's totally not the case. It took time for sure but I've made peace with the fact that I may not have or make long term connections or have deep friendships but the social interactions I do get are still satisfying enough that I don't feel like I need more than what I've got and if by chance it does come I'll still be grateful but it's not the primary end goal, just something that could happen along the way on the path of life.

I wish I could phrase my thoughts better but I definitely agree with what you're expressing here and it'd definitely be a breath of fresh air to get an introvert character who doesn't have to go through being "fixed" to fit some societal standard of acceptable levels of social behavior

(post withdrawn by author, will be automatically deleted in 24 hours unless flagged)

Coming at this as a reader, is this for you or for the audience. If it's self therapy, have at it. Write that story. But there is a reason people don't write that story, people for the most part don't want to read it. Certain stories don't bring in an audience. Depressive stories, which being alone is usually seen as depressive, don't sell. There is a reason romance, where the main characters get together at the end, do sell. Because that is part of the writer/reader genre contract. That reader came to get that ending and the writer by putting it in that genre, should deliver. All I'm saying go into this with eyes open to what you want as an outcome.

This idea of what defines loneliness feels like it comes from a very cut off space and I find that interesting. These things are in the head to an extent. I always had strong beliefs about the difference between what it means to be lonely and what it means to be in solitude, because it always seemed like lonliness required the longing for human connections, while solitude is for lack of a better term enjoyment despite independance from others. A man can enjoy the freedom of total isolation, being happy in solitude is freedom from loneliness.

I have always lived as an outcast myself for one reason or another and still am in most of my ways. I'm a hermit. Even when I wasn't I certainly felt a deep lonliness even when I was surrounded by others since I can't connect well with anyone online or off. This happens to a lot of people and everyone around them just assumes they are fine until something bad happens.
Many people see the growth of being lonely to being extroverted as the obvious answer to make a happy story. But I find that the transition of a character from being sheltered and feeling lonely like he is totally dependant on other people to tell him how to live or what to like or dislike, to a person who can maintain a level of independance and even learn to enjoy time cut away from the world and people makes for an even better story.

I struggled with this same thing in my own life. Stories made it seem like in high school, you were supposed to have one best, best friend who was basically like your sibling whom you're co-dependant upon and a rag-tag group of weirdos who were your ride or dies. That didn't happen with me, my BFF broke my trust and I haven't spoken to her since. My group of friends in college changed semester to semester, and making friends as an adult is like being back in school again. No magic BFF has come to save me from my loneliness.

As I've learned more about myself, I learned that I am okay being alone. I need solitude to recharge, but that doesn't stop me from making social connections. If I want friends, I have to make them.

In terms of storytelling, I think people use it as an easy way to "other" their characters to make them more sympathetic, while glazing over major plot holes. For example, the MC could be clearly abused by group A, but group B is clearly better because they're more accepting. I wish there was a clean-cut way to fix it.

The only story that comes to mind that touches on this is Watamote. The main character Kuroki wants to be cute and popular, but doesn't get it in the end (in the anime; not sure how the manga goes).

I remember an episode when Kuroki relates to an anime character who was lonely like her until a classmate came by which caused a relationship to blossom. In reality, that never happens since someone sitting alone minding their business usually means "Don't bother me" which is why she doesn't get that same experience as that character.

In my case(and Kuroki's), no one will be my friend, I have to be their friend, but since I'm introverted, social interactions are mentally draining which makes it hard to bother. Those kinds of stories make socializing seem easier than it really is since someone else is doing the work.

  1. Never said anything about wanting to write a "depressing" story (If anything, I said the opposite)
  2. Never said anything about "selling" (???)
  3. Y'know, it's entirely possible to want to write a story that just details a human experience you're familiar with, and hope that someone out there will connect with it or just enjoy it, without any major expectations beyond that...? Y'know, just the normal drive to create that most storytellers experience...??

The fact that the type of story I want to write isn't popular does not factor into my decision-making, outside of the thought that "hey, most people don't do this idea...maybe I should try". Like, that's literally it. :T
And I honestly find it a little...sad, that your first assumption is that if an idea doesn't have a good chance to "sell" (imagine giving capitalism that much control over your art...) with the mainstream public, then the only real reason to write it is "self-therapy". Which...isn't actually a thing everyone does. ._. I don't.

TL;DR, artistic expression/exploration exists, and believe it or not many people still create with that in mind. I really think you should be aware of that if you're going to interact with other artists.

P.S. Depressing stories actually DO sell, even in the mainstream. Tragedy has been a whole genre for thousands of years, and people regularly flock to novels, documentaries and films chronicling depressing, tragic, horrible incidents, especially when they're based on real life. Even if I intended to write a depressing story on this topic (which, again, I don't) it wouldn't be weird or out of line.

I really wish people would stop saying "NoBoDy LiKeS dEpReSsInG StOrIeS" whenever I bring up these social issues, because it's so blatantly untrue that it feels like a pathetic attempt at censorship. Imagine saying this to someone who wanted to write about surviving illness, or abuse, or living in poverty, or losing a loved one-- all "depressing" subjects that people write about all the time and are regularly celebrated for. But somehow THIS subject is off-limits. THIS one crosses the line. Just the idea of living alone is too much for audiences to handle. Please, just give it up. T_T Find another mark, because I'm not stupid enough to actually believe you.

^Oooh, that's something I actually forgot about, but very true. ^^ In fact, it's probably the major factor that makes these stories unlikeable to me, the idea that all you have to do to make a friend, as an introvert, is wait for an extraverted person to walk over and "adopt" you (infantilizing neurodivergent people ftw...), and make all the effort in the relationship so you don't have to.

It's actually a concept that I legitimately...hate. Like, with the burning fury of a thousand suns. ^^;;; Because I've been in "friendships" like that before, and they actually really suck. It's not obvious at first, and of course it's convenient to automatically have someone to hang out with and do societally-mandated social activities with, but 'convenience' isn't enough to build a friendship on, and eventually it will show.

Eventually you will realize that you:
a) Always have to do what the extraverted friend wants to do, because you either don't feel confident enough in the relationship to make your own suggestions, or you're so used to solitary activities you don't even have anything to suggest. =/ Oh well.
b) May not even actually like this person or have anything in common with them, but feel like rejecting them would be too mean. After all, they did you the honor of trying to be your friend, so you should be grateful, right?? It's not like you'd be fine hanging out by yourself if there's no one around that you actually WANT to spend time with....oh wait...

It's just a situation that breeds resentment and toxicity, especially if the person "adopting" you actually sees themselves as the superior in the relationship, and does not respect your opinions or your right to say "no" (which...I've also dealt with, unfortunately).
Every time I've had a friendship like this, it's either come to a sudden abrupt end, or it's slowly and painfully fizzled out because I just ran out of energy to keep dealing with the person, had no idea how to articulate that in a socially-acceptable way, and started to feel helpless and desperate to get away from them.

...So yeah. Not a fan of those portrayals of "easy friendship". :T

Pretty sure you want to argue to just argue about this. When I say sell, I meant in the overall term to "buy" it. It has nothing to do with money. There is nothing wrong to just make a comic for yourself or the possibility of a small group of people to read it. And to say people flock to tragedies for thousands of years doesn't hold water as just look at tapas or webtoons or even hollywood as see what is making money. Money shows what people like as they willingly paid to go see it. It's a way of voting for what you like. I never said the subject is off limits, I say go into with your eyes open to the outcome.

Finally, all your artistic expression talk smacks of elitism. I never said you shouldn't have it but somehow you think I need to become aware that some people still have it. That is not only rude but you imply I don't "get it". No one is censoring you. If you post in a forum, expect people to respond to you with their outlook. Just because its not the outlook you want shouldn't make you defensive. It's a public forum. It's not your forum.

...OK. ._.

And if you reply in a forum, you shouldn't be surprised if the person you replied to reacts to your replies, disagrees with them, and decides to argue against them. I have as much right to comment on your thoughts as you have to comment on mine. Yes, even if my comments are negative.

Anyway, since what I said was apparently so nonsensical that I must have been "arguing just to argue", I'll try to explain my rationale a bit:

Just as you never said I wasn't allowed to write about what I want, I never said I was trying to create a story to bring in an audience. Possible public reception was never once mentioned in my OP; you were the first one in this thread to even use the word "audience".
So since you brought in this idea * literally* out of nowhere and all by yourself, I thought it must mean that you don't fully understand why I'm proposing this story idea. I.E., you think maybe I didn't mention audience reception because I didn't realize it might be an issue, without knowing that (a) I don't care, and/or (b) it's very normal for an artist/writer to not care. =/ So I explained it.

But if you ARE aware of both a and b, then that leaves me with the less charitable interpretations...Like, do you go around evaluating future audience metrics to everyone who proposes a new subject to write about?? Because that's weird and unnecessary.

Do you think anyone who proposes an unorthodox idea needs to be warned that audiences may not like it? Because that's also weird and unnecessary, and it makes it look like you're trying to discourage originality. Or, you don't think the OP is mature enough to be aware of that...even though it's pretty obvious that most of us are. This forum is 75% promotional threads, do you really think the average user here does not understand the idea that the general public has its own tastes that might differ from theirs...? Unless the OP specifically asks if their idea will be popular, you really don't need to tell people that.

And finally, there's the least charitable interpretation: that, because this idea just happens not to align with your idea of a story that's worth reading, you felt the need to warn me away from it (as if your personal tastes represent everyone's). Which would be dismissive, disrespectful, and just plain offensive, and you should fully expect someone to take issue with that.
Do you know what I do when someone on this forum makes a topic about a story idea I don't like or that I don't find relatable? I stay out of it. I don't write a reply telling them that "there's a reason people don't write that story" and hoping that reassuring them that they're allowed to write it anyway (???) makes up for that.

The idea that someone is allowed to write a story you might not like (or that LOTS of people might not like, even) should be the default. You don't need to tell people that, it just sounds passive-aggressive.
"Oh, that outfit is so ugly; there's a reason people don't dress like that...but go ahead and wear it though, just go into it with your eyes open and know what to expect :kissing_heart:" <--- That's what that sounds like.
When it would be much kinder to just...acknowledge that people can wear (or write!) what they want, and realize that means your "warnings" are not needed.

I'm trying to be charitable and assume you never thought about it this way; I know there are people that tend to just express their opinions however/whenever and assume that if they meant something in a helpful/neutral way, then that's how everyone should perceive it. But that isn't realistic or true, and when your comments offend people, there's usually a reason for it.

That story sounds like it would be an interesting read.

Personally I don't like reading a story that is depressing all the way through, depending on how you write it I might like. Back when I was still in high school, I read a lot of really depressing stories, especially ones that ended really sad but they almost always end in a way that never felt right for me. Some try too hard to make the reader happy when clearly they never resolved the issue and others don't even try to make a happy ending and just straight up kill anything good in the main character's path.

Though this is just my opinion, so I might look forward to your story if you do ever write it.

A lot of these "lonely/outcast finds friends" tend to just be fantasy. They are superficial the same way romance can be superficial. But I think people just like the escapism of them. I think of something like Naruto or My Little Pony where the friendship ends up giving them superpowers and such.

I do agree that media needs to be more open about how mental health can effect groups of people differently. How you help a lonely able bodied 12 year old girl is going to be very different than how you help a 50 year old man who is a disabled veteran. What happens when there are cultural barriers, language barriers, low income, or they live somewhere that has no community resources?

I think with a lot of these stories, I don't think we need to see the "makes 200 friends" approach. I think normalizing someone just making one friend. People socializing with their family. That someone can be lonely but still have acquaintances who are kind to them (instead of lonely people being hated by everyone). Maybe someone's best friend is their pet. Etc.

It's different from replying and the passive/aggressive attacks you put forth. You are putting the lowest based reasons for me to comment. You put out an idea. I responded. You then attack saying I don't "get it" and want to censor ideas. Then I explain I'm not and then you comment giving me motives that were not there in the first place. I think you just want to talk, so I'm going to bow out and let you go.

...So, I painstakingly write out 6 or 7 different ways I could have perceived your behavior, carefully explain why I might have thought each one may or may not have applied and what I didn't like about it, and ^that's your takeaway. T_T

If you're determined to think that I'm "attacking" you every time I dislike the things you say, and refuse to read or understand my explanations for my beliefs...then maybe it's best that you just stop replying to my threads?? Like, this keeps happening, and I don't know why you feel the need to keep hopping in to give me these "helpful" hints and suggestions when you seem diametrically opposed to the way I think.

There are lots of developing artists and writers around here who might actually appreciate and absorb your way of thinking. Meanwhile, I'm already a mature creator, I have dozens of works under my belt and you're not going to change me by continuing to do this. You're just going to invite more arguments.

I'm seeing a lot of "this sounds interesting, but I don't like depressing stories" and like, there's nothing inherently depressing about being alone. Going on a walk through nature, seeing all that beauty at your own pace on your own terms? Listening to music while dancing and singing terribly because no-ones around to see your cringe? Making sloppy sketches of your favorite obscure characters or writing weird headcanons that no-one will ever read? Eating good food and watching your favorite shows?

There is something to be said about it being sad that you're missing out on human connection, dancing and singing with your friends is more fun than dancing alone. But there is still joy there, you can still find beauty and joy while alone. And if you aren't in a position to create and uphold your connections it's good to see that.

It's been a minute since the last incident, so forgive me if I repeat myself.

I feel like I can see a story like this being made. Like a story about someone finding a hobby that brings them joy, not necessarily meeting people through it (or if they do, it's in passing) and the act of pursuing that hobby brings the main character joy in itself.

It reminds me of something I heard about one guy on Reddit who iirc got out of being an incel once he took up raising shrimp. Of course, the MC doesn't have to start off that extreme.

The only story I can think of that's kind of close to "Main character being on their own and staying that way" is one I found on Wattpad years ago (Adventures of the Travelling Fisherman by CaptinKera), but that does focus on relationships the MC has with other people, even if they're short and fleeting. Also the MC isn't really a social outcast, he's pretty socially adept but just chooses to travel alone.

Relationships can heal, but learning how to thrive while alone can heal in its own way.

Personally, I like stories centered on characters making their peace with a particular aspect of themselves. It's interesting to see them come to the realization of who they are and accept themselves, and that's a totally valid form of character development. Especially when you show everyone around them pressuring them to conform. And that's really at the core for me, the idea that people need to conform vs the acceptance of oneself after gaining a better understanding.

For what it's worth, depressing stories totally sell. It's why we have an entire genre dedicated to drama. I wrote a story on Wattpad about depression, loss, and moving on and it's a Paid Story with a decent readership and plenty of really lovely comments from readers. I didn't really expect it to do so well when I wrote it, because I knew it wasn't what most people on the site are looking for, but I enjoyed writing it and putting forth my take on the topic as it came from a personal point of view. If you're really interested in writing it, you definitely should. There's an audience out there for pretty much anything online.

Good idea, people can relate to a character like that and I´m pretty sure that a lot of
people would be interested in reading a story like that

To be fair, I don't mind stories with social outcasts finding friends as much. Then again I always the type that liked friendship stories because it helped me in some ways when I was younger.

I do believe we could use more stories on learning how to deal with loneliness without needing or waiting for another person. Let's be real, it's harder to make friends the older you get and people in life do leave or come back at times. It help younger people to learn how to be alone without waiting for others to validate them time to time.

Like @VibrantFox said, that's a problem when living in a extrovert-driven society. I think there is a market for stories and you can learn some life lessons from that. Then again, that's my opinion.

To me the "lonely protagonist being 'rescued' by a magical BFF" plot seems like the introvert's fantasy; not the fantasy of condescending extroverts trying to make everyone "normal" or w/e. Many people in your previous thread saying "humans are social animals; a character who doesn't desire interpersonal connections is not realistically human" were introverts themselves.

The "being adopted by an extrovert" meme is also mostly being cycled by introverts; they're the ones jokingly "infantilizing" themselves, not neurotypical extroverts infantilizing them by making fun of how helpless they are. It's basically the platonic version of the "manic pixie dream girl" trope.

If we're talking about a trope that actually seems to be about extroverts "fixing" introverts, it's the "comedic duo" of the quiet, serious one and the loud, silly one, where the latter continuously annoys and harasses the former and the former is treated as "a meanie stick in the mud who takes things too seriously" when they rightfully get annoyed at the latter ... until the quiet, serious one undergoes "character development" and learns to "loosen up" (i.e. accepting the loud, silly one's actions bc they're a nice person who just wants to help you break out of your shell).

But I do like your approach to subverting the "lonely protagonist being 'rescued' by a magical BFF" trope. I myself was lonely and wanted someone to "adopt" me as their friend when I was younger, but a Watamote-style message of "you gotta take initiative and be the one to make the effort to improve yourself and make friends" would have seemed very "prescriptive"; like we're still operating under the assumption that friendship is a need and this it's my "job" to put in effort to acquire that friendship, with no thought given to my cost-benefit analysis on tradeoffs and whether my desire for friendship is actually worth the risk and resources it costs me.

It's valid to want friendship but also choose to not spend the costs to pursue it if it's too much of a tradeoff. It is an option. As long as you're not blaming other people for the costs being too high, it doesn't make you a friendship-incel. :stuck_out_tongue:

If I had to guess, it's probably because the title mention social outcasts (which implies a character is not alone by choice, but because they're being actively rejected by the people around them) and loneliness (which as @Nugtown mentioned is different from solitude). The OP itself does explain in more detail, but titles tend to stick in people's heads XD